Re: proposal for SHACL based on SPARQL

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

OK.  I'll list them right at that spot in addition to the other places that
they are listed.

peter

PS:  They turn out to be recursive shapes and closed shapes.  Hmm, neither
of these are actually accepted requirements yet, so I'll change the wording
as well.

On 04/22/2015 01:33 PM, Ted Thibodeau Jr wrote:
> 
> On Apr 17, 2015, at 03:23 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I light of
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2015/04/16-shapes-minutes.html#resolution03 
>> RESOLUTION: All proposals to be considered should be in decent shape by
>> the end of the month (30 April) or will be dropped
>> 
>> I updated my proposal for a SHACL based on SPARQL at 
>> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Shacl-sparql
>> 
>> 
>> I welcome questions and suggestions for improvement.
>> 
>> peter
> 
> 
> "Several SHACL accepted requirements cannot be handled in SPARQL and so
> are not in this proposal for SHACL."
> 
> Enumerating these would make informed consideration of this proposal much
> less challenging.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ted
> 
> 
> 
> -- A: Yes.
> http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html | Q: Are you sure? | | A: Because
> it reverses the logical flow of conversation. | | | Q: Why is top posting
> frowned upon?
> 
> Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32 
> Senior Support & Evangelism  //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com 
> //              http://twitter.com/TallTed OpenLink Software, Inc.
> //              http://www.openlinksw.com/ 10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite
> 265, Burlington MA 01803 Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/ 
> LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/ Twitter
> -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink Google+  --
> http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/ Facebook --
> http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware Universal Data Access,
> Integration, and Management Technology Providers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVOAvnAAoJECjN6+QThfjzp2UH/3Nyb9e8DcsNzpUfDhkX02aI
vlJKqjCXG6hR4J3pjS5fTOg6sejru4iw7/O4bv33pbwHM5G3Z3cMJqIa5S42wpeQ
2Kq8Gi9VAtAtOkAHumCa/ZkaM052bcMXaVYgu0IOZJK/lne9BHxxb/FLBNLWFnJr
v/Jizl4ksqZkcAK0XYr2xNuyoeZHD1UlOYqsG7TUBsMwByD8PkyqSe4FMssRFzCT
xQwGGHqdfxNrc6wqupd1KxSzv411QrA0r2dpUVjYl3+kPIWiCGWQu+aGJYmoLygK
xNn0j3MugWwWSSEW+wFaTTTs9p+KMXfMhKu7TJtW/24u944O8N6AVFgh+h0chC0=
=VS/F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 21:00:56 UTC