- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 08:14:14 +0200
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
> Built-in here means part of the official spec (similar to how "my" > draft does this right now) - part of the "Full" language. Not just an > example, but mandatory for anyone claiming full SHACL support. So basically, although other languages could be supported as well anyone who is claiming full SHACL support must be able to parse constraint templates using SPARQL as extension language? I guess the issue here is to clarify to what extent do we force SPARQL support. What minimal subset of SPARQL (features) must be supported? cheers, simon --- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2015-04-17 03:07, schrieb Holger Knublauch: > Built-in here means part of the official spec (similar to how "my" > draft does this right now) - part of the "Full" language. Not just an > example, but mandatory for anyone claiming full SHACL support. > > HTH > Holger > > > On 4/17/2015 10:49, Karen Coyle wrote: >> Holger, it would help if you could define what you mean by "built-in." >> Do you mean included in the spec? If so, included as a complete >> solution, as an example, ????? >> >> Thanks, >> kc >> >> On 4/16/15 5:23 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in >>> extension language [SHACL Spec] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/45 >>> >>> Raised by: Holger Knublauch >>> On product: SHACL Spec >>> >>> I think there is enough agreement that SHACL should have an >>> "extension" language to cover cases not addressed by the core >>> vocabulary, and to define new high-level terms (templates). I believe >>> we should get the question clarified whether SPARQL is such an >>> extension language. This question is independent of whether other >>> languages such as JavaScript could also be supported - that would be >>> another ISSUE. >>> >>> PROPOSAL: SHACL should include SPARQL as an extension language. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
Received on Friday, 17 April 2015 06:15:09 UTC