Re: shapes-ISSUE-36 (Value type facet): Naming of value type facet [SHACL Spec]

The current votes on [1] are

  * HK: sh:type > sh:class
  * HS: sh:type > sh:class
  * SSt: sh:type > sh:valueType > the rest (similarity of sh:type &
    rdf:type is imho beneficial)
  * DK: sh:valueType > sh:valueClass
  * KC: sh:valueType
  * RC: sh:class > the rest > sh:objectType and sh:resourceType; the
    last two are too confusing


PROPOSAL: The core property to constrain values so that they must be 
instances of a given class should be called sh:type.

I hope we can do a quick poll to resolve this in the upcoming meeting.

Thanks,
Holger

[1] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Facet_Property_Names#Value_Type


On 4/7/2015 11:13, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> On 4/5/2015 0:15, Karen Coyle wrote:
>> "Facet" is used throughout the document. If it doesn't have a 
>> specific meaning then I suggest dropping it.
>
> Done.
>
> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/92455d29446da78640f79b5f3f6979a4aa6b8505 
>
>
> Holger
>