- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 19:13:09 -0700
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
OK, I see that OWL has ObjectExactCardinality. However, many programming languages as well as SQL have something called "count" which is a function that counts the number of occurrences of something. So, 1. that OWL has this feature does not make it a commonly used feature in the IT world 2. the name "count" is going to be horribly confusing If this must exist, then a name closer to "exactCardinality" is called for. "Count" is not going to be ok. kc On 4/6/15 6:46 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > A hypothetical property sh:count in addition to sh:minCount and > sh:maxCount would be equivalent to OWL having owl:cardinality in > addition to owl:minCardinality and owl:maxCardinality. From the current > state of > > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Facet_Property_Names > > it looks like there is a slight majority in favor of adding such a third > property. We need to keep in mind that a lot of people edit Turtle/JSON > files by hand, so although I am working for a company specializing in > editing tools, we cannot really rely on interactive tools to create the > min/max statements for us. Having said this, there is also an argument > to be made against having multiple ways to state the same thing, so I > don't really have a strong opinion either way. > > Holger > > > On 4/5/2015 4:29, Karen Coyle wrote: >> I'm not familiar with any prior use of "count" to mean "min and max >> cardinalities have the same value." Can anyone enlighten me as to >> where else that is used? >> >> kc >> >> On 4/2/15 4:20 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> shapes-ISSUE-38 (Cardinality facet): Naming of cardinality facets >>> [SHACL Spec] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/38 >>> >>> Raised by: Holger Knublauch >>> On product: SHACL Spec >>> >>> See https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Facet_Property_Names >>> >>> How should the facet properties for cardinalities be called, and do >>> we need a property for min+max count? Please cast your vote on the >>> page linked above. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 02:13:41 UTC