Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] from Richard Cyganiak on 2015-04-03 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2015)

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:17:22 +0100
To: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Cc: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <FFF57C44-ADE5-4C76-A7BD-9589954D31EB@cyganiak.de>

> On 3 Apr 2015, at 14:31, Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
> 
> In this case, how should we re-formulate the example in 1.2 [1] so that a shacl engine does not get confused and consider ex:SubmitterShape as a class?

Why would it be a problem to consider ex:SubmitterShape a class?

Best,
Richard


> 
> [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#introduction-overview
>  
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dimitris Kontokostas
> Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
> Research Group: http://aksw.org
> Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas

Received on Friday, 3 April 2015 15:17:48 UTC