- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 06:25:57 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Holger, this is indeed how I was picturing it. BTW, couldn't 4 be 3.3? It seems analogous to 3.2. kc On 4/1/15 5:50 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Arthur suggested to me that it would be good to have a more visible > separation between > > Introduction > Section 2 - 6 (Core) > Section 7 onwards (Advanced) > > I wish I could separate the Table of Contents so that it looked like > > * 1.Introduction <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#introduction> > o 1.1Document Outline > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#introduction-outline> > o 1.2Overview and Terminology of Core Features > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#introduction-overview> > o 1.3Overview and Terminology of Advanced Features > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#introduction-overview-advanced> > o 1.4Namespaces <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#namespaces> > > *PART 1: **SHACL Core Profile** > * > > * 2.Shapes <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#shapes> > o 2.1Shape Labels and Comments > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#shape-labels> > o 2.2Shape Specialization Mechanism > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#shape-specialization> > o 2.3Shape Constraints > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#shape-constraints> > * 3.Property Constraints > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#property-constraints> > o 3.1Property Constraints (sh:property) > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#property-constraints-property> > > + 3.1.1sh:allowedValues > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#AbstractAllowedValuesPropertyConstraint> > + 3.1.2sh:datatype > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#AbstractDatatypePropertyConstraint> > + 3.1.3sh:hasValue > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#AbstractHasValuePropertyConstraint> > + 3.1.4sh:minCount, sh:maxCount > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#AbstractCountPropertyConstraint> > + 3.1.5sh:nodeKind > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#AbstractNodeKindPropertyConstraint> > + 3.1.6sh:valueShape > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#AbstractValueShapePropertyConstraint> > + 3.1.7sh:valueType > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#AbstractValueTypePropertyConstraint> > o 3.2Inverse Property Constraints (sh:inverseProperty) > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#property-constraints-inverseProperty> > * 4.Disjunctive Constraints (sh:OrConstraint) > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#or> > * 5.Scope of Constraints (sh:scope) > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#scope> > * 6.Constraint Violations Vocabulary > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations> > o 6.1Types of Constraint Violations > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations-types> > o 6.2Structural Violation Metadata > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations-structure> > + 6.2.1sh:root > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations-structure-root> > + 6.2.2sh:path > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations-structure-path> > + 6.2.3sh:value > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations-structure-value> > + 6.2.4sh:source > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations-structure-source> > + 6.2.5sh:detail > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations-structure-detail> > o 6.3Human-readable Violation Messages (sh:message) > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#violations-message> > * > > *PART 2: Advanced Topics** > * > > **7.General Shape Constraints (sh:constraint) > <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#general-constraints> > * ... > > I do not believe ReSpec allows me to do that (does anyone know?), but > I'd be happy to manually inject such intermediate headers into the final > HTML before publication. It would also make it easier for us to state > that we expect feedback on Part 1 as part of the FPWD while we could > leave Part 2 as "informative" and unstable if we cannot agree on this in > time of publication. > > Thanks, > Holger > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2015 13:26:27 UTC