shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] from RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker on 2015-04-02 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2015)

From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 06:01:42 +0000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1YdYCE-000CLK-Aj@deneb.w3.org>

shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec]

http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/34

Raised by: Simon Steyskal
On product: SHACL Spec

I was wondering whether we want to "limit" ourselves to 2 disjuncts (i.e. sh:shape1 & sh:shape2) at a time, rather than having potentially n disjuncts as proposed by Eric's "sh:choice" construct.

Ofc, one could nest another sh:OrConstraint within sh:shape2 and if necessary another one in the nested one and so forth, but I guess this gets pretty ugly/verbose very quickly.

Any thoughts on this? Or am I missing something?

cheers,
simon

Received on Thursday, 2 April 2015 06:01:47 UTC