- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:21:29 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
I agree with both Peter and Simon that shape selection needs to be included in the user documentation aimed at those using SHACL to encode their data validation rules. Currently, documentation for that audience immediately follows the introduction. kc On 4/1/15 8:14 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I think that the issue is not whether shape selection is in a particular > part of the documenation, but whether shape selection is part of the > high-level langauge/core/lite. > > My vote is that shape selection is an important part of SHACL and thus > deserves to be part of that distinguished part. > > peter > > > On 04/01/2015 02:20 AM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> shapes-ISSUE-33 (Simonstey): Shifting section "Shape Selection" to >> introduction? [SHACL Spec] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/33 >> >> Raised by: Simon Steyskal On product: SHACL Spec >> >> Information on how to associate shapes with resources/data they constrain >> is imho very crucial and should be part of the introduction rather than >> being placed somewhere at the end of the specification. >> >> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVHAtSAAoJECjN6+QThfjzPz4IAJB3/QDrfXHImpi1ui3KEAFr > s0FOxg6ssWtUMziWpjHgAx8Z6Qn+IaIAiUXZ2uoKXtdUVwJZmP5wmSqjJfMKhYU1 > LB/M5nQoWb0lB3lZEpk+DLztKQUAEvCd6+wY2+rMhz1pyrod/5ZLprgaApnnGtu6 > giHIm1ENnOlSH7AKohxjwvEPwOIGAsmx4UvrPiaEvSK/LkFpe/kd0LIAeysqwygJ > wZK8BAedjXWYP7Jc32qVVd+Ddvj+q0FN9t2GS2DZ7Pdy0Nyv4/xycidWFu95mu+i > bRXuXDNlslZ9JVDwwivnF81psag1c37o+XzD4mzcspggIK7YpARgRbeUmkSRACY= > =yHKb > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2015 18:21:58 UTC