- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:23:18 -0800
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 17:23:50 UTC
Is this something we can resolve without knowing which technology we are going to use though? -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM Software Group From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org Date: 11/20/2014 03:22 PM Subject: Role of SPARQL I think we should raise an issue to determine the role of SPARQL in this stack. One of the reasons why I believe this is an important direction is that it will impact ISSUE-1 (inferencing). For example, see the unresolved feature request brought to our attention by Axel: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:ParameterizedInference The interaction is that if SPARQL (in general) had a syntax to specify entailment regimes, and Shapes are based on SPARQL, then the topic of inferencing may become a non-issue from a Shapes perspective - it would be solved in the lower parts of the stack. From what I can guess by listening to previous discussions, many people here are in favor of defining Shapes with SPARQL semantics, at least with a mapping/compilation to SPARQL, so I believe this is a topic that we should formally discuss and resolve. Holger
Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 17:23:50 UTC