- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:24:49 -0800
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- CC: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
RDFS is part of the RDF spec, so we do not have to go beyond the RDF spec to get the benefits of RDFS. peter On 11/12/2014 06:17 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > [...] >> On 11/12/2014 05:14 AM, Arthur Ryman wrote: >>> Eric, >>> >>> Thanks. Yes, Peter is right. The terms use lexical forms. So we need to >>> refer to the datatype value space explicitly when defining the semantics >>> of constraints. This does not mean that we need to go beyond the RDF >> spec >>> and depend on RDFS or OWL. >>> _________________________________________________________ >>> Arthur Ryman >>> Chief Data Officer >>> SWG | Rational >>> 905.413.3077 (phone) | 416.939.5063 (cell) >>> IBM InterConnect 2015 >>> >>>
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 22:25:19 UTC