Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?

On 11/06/2014 07:29 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> * Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> [2014-11-06 09:20-0500]

[...]


> Maybe I should add that I described the current limitation in terms of
> context-sensitivity because the current algorithm doesn't enable the
> context (e.g. an owl:Restriction) to assert that _:Bob (a foaf:Person)
> should be constrained as a submitter and as an assignee.
>

That's OK, I think, but please remember that "context-sensitive grammar" is 
often taken to mean a grammar for a context-sensitive language (i.e., not 
context-free), which is a technical term with, I believe, a quite different 
meaning.


peter

Received on Thursday, 6 November 2014 17:19:13 UTC