- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 09:38:29 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
While we are collecting and cleaning up requirements and use cases, I am trying to see if we can do technical preparation work in parallel. It would IMHO be sad if we spend the next few months with nothing but requirements, especially given that EricP already had collected quite a number of requirements and I believe we already have quite a good basic understanding of what the WG is supposed to deliver. Maybe we could also create Wiki pages to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each technology, allowing the proponents to clarify what they envision. It should be clear that any input technology is just the starting point, and that missing features can be added to any of the languages. So looking at the meeting last week, I believe the current catalog of starting points is: - ShEx - OWL (Closed World) only - Resource Shapes + SPIN - OWL + SPIN - OWL + Resource Shapes + SPIN - Any other (new) technology ? Are any other proposals on the table? I have not included Resource Shapes stand-alone because it would be very similar to ShEx but without extension mechanism. Holger
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 23:41:03 UTC