Thursday, 27 November 2014
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: Requirements (was Re: Role of SPARQL)
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 
Wednesday, 26 November 2014
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - RE: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed
 - RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed
 - Issue-4 Tracker test
 - shapes-ISSUE-4 (Test): Test - please ignore
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - User story S34: Large-scale dataset validation
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 
Tuesday, 25 November 2014
- Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
 - Re: When to dive into technical details
 - Re: The SKOS constraint checking use case
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN
 - Re: The SKOS constraint checking use case
 - RE: Role of SPARQL
 - RE: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - RE: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - RE: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
 - Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - RE: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
 - RE: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
 - RE: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
 - Requirements (was Re: Role of SPARQL)
 - RE: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
 - Re: When to dive into technical details
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Change of RDF Data Shapes WG F2F2 dates
 - RE: Role of SPARQL
 
Monday, 24 November 2014
- Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: When to dive into technical details
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - RE: Hydra and Shapes
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
 
Saturday, 22 November 2014
Friday, 21 November 2014
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Role of SPARQL
 - Re: When to dive into technical details
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 
Thursday, 20 November 2014
- Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
 - Role of SPARQL
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - When to dive into technical details
 - Re: Glossary for the working group
 - Re: Glossary for the working group
 - RE: Glossary for the working group
 - Re: Glossary for the working group
 - Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 and 12 November 2014
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 and 12 November 2014
 - Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 and 12 November 2014
 - RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 and 12 November 2014
 - Regrets for teleconference
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 
Wednesday, 19 November 2014
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 20 November 2014
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 20 November 2014
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Glossary for the working group
 - Re: Glossary for the working group
 - Re: Glossary for the working group
 - Re: Glossary for the working group
 - Re: Glossary for the working group
 - Re: Glossary for the working group
 - Glossary for the working group
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - User Story: LDP: POST content to Container of a certain shape
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Reusable Shapes
 - Re: Reusable Shapes
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Reusable Shapes
 - Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: Reusable Shapes (was: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations)
 - Reusable Shapes (was: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations)
 - isolating shapes in named graphs
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Combining multiple queries for execution
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Combining multiple queries for execution
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Introduction
 - Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience?
 
Tuesday, 18 November 2014
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience?
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience?
 - Introduction
 - Re: Fwd: Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Fwd: Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-3 (Shape association): How is a shape associated with a graph?
 - rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience?
 - rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-1 (Entailment regime): What is the entailment regime?
 - Re: Hydra and Shapes
 
Monday, 17 November 2014
Friday, 14 November 2014
Thursday, 13 November 2014
- Re: Renumbered rdf:List stress test user story
 - AW: CORRECTION: Weekly WG call set on Thusrday 2pm ET starting next week on 20 November
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: More examples
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Renumbered rdf:List stress test user story
 - More examples
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 
Wednesday, 12 November 2014
- Building on parts of RDFS (was: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations)
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Renumbered rdf:List stress test user story
 - RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - RE: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 - RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 
Tuesday, 11 November 2014
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 - RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 - RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 12 November (Wednesday!!)
 - Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 12 November (Wednesday!!)
 - RE: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 - RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 12 November (Wednesday!!)
 - Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 - CORRECTION: Weekly WG call set on Thusrday 2pm ET starting next week on 20 November
 - Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 - Re: Weekly WG call now set on Thusrday 2pm ET!!
 - Re: Weekly WG call now set on Thusrday 2pm ET!!
 - Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 - Re: Weekly WG call now set on Thusrday 2pm ET!!
 - Weekly WG call now set on Thusrday 2pm ET!!
 - Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 - Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 - Re: SPARQL equivalence semantics
 - Re: SPARQL equivalence semantics
 - Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 
Monday, 10 November 2014
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
 - Re: SPARQL equivalence semantics
 - test case for term equivalence
 - Re: SPARQL equivalence semantics
 - SPARQL equivalence semantics
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 
Saturday, 8 November 2014
Friday, 7 November 2014
- Re: unlikely to make the WG meeting on the 12th
 - Poll for WG weekly calls schedule
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Weekly phone call times
 - Re: Weekly phone call times
 - Re: AW: Re: Weekly phone call times
 - Re: Weekly phone call times
 - Re: AW: Re: Weekly phone call times
 - AW: Re: Weekly phone call times
 - Re: Weekly phone call times
 - Re: unlikely to make the WG meeting on the 12th
 - Re: Weekly phone call times
 - Re: unlikely to make the WG meeting on the 12th
 - unlikely to make the WG meeting on the 12th
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: AW: Weekly phone call times
 - Re: Weekly phone call times
 - Re: Weekly phone call times
 - AW: Weekly phone call times
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Weekly phone call times
 
Thursday, 6 November 2014
- Extending SPIN with meta-templates (was: Can Shapes always be Classes?)
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: RDFS domain/range issues
 - Re: RDFS domain/range issues
 - Re: RDFS domain/range issues
 - Re: RDFS domain/range issues
 - AW: Re: Use Cases wiki pages
 - Re: Use Cases wiki pages
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 
Wednesday, 5 November 2014
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: RDFS domain/range issues
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - rdfdatashapestracker-ACTION-1: Copy User stories from piratepad to Wiki
 - Re: Technology options
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Re: RDFS domain/range issues
 - Re: RDFS domain/range issues
 - Re: RDFS domain/range issues
 - Re: Technology options
 - Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - Can Shapes always be Classes?
 - The SKOS constraint checking use case
 - Re: Use Cases wiki pages
 - Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2014
 - Re: RDFS domain/range issues
 
Tuesday, 4 November 2014
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2014
 - Re: Use Cases wiki pages
 - Re: Use Cases wiki pages
 - Re: Use Cases wiki pages
 - RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2014
 - Re: Use Cases wiki pages
 - Use Cases wiki pages
 - Re: RDFS domain/range issues (was: a view of SPIN constraints)
 - Re: Technology options
 - Re: a view of SPIN constraints
 - Re: a view of SPIN constraints
 - RDFS domain/range issues (was: a view of SPIN constraints)
 - Re: a view of SPIN constraints
 - Re: a view of SPIN constraints
 - Re: a view of SPIN constraints