Thursday, 27 November 2014
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: Requirements (was Re: Role of SPARQL)
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
Wednesday, 26 November 2014
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- RE: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed
- RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed
- Issue-4 Tracker test
- shapes-ISSUE-4 (Test): Test - please ignore
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs)
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- User story S34: Large-scale dataset validation
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: Role of SPARQL
Tuesday, 25 November 2014
- Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
- Re: When to dive into technical details
- Re: The SKOS constraint checking use case
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN
- Re: The SKOS constraint checking use case
- RE: Role of SPARQL
- RE: Role of SPARQL
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- RE: Role of SPARQL
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- RE: Role of SPARQL
- Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
- Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- RE: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
- RE: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
- RE: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
- Requirements (was Re: Role of SPARQL)
- RE: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
- Re: When to dive into technical details
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Change of RDF Data Shapes WG F2F2 dates
- RE: Role of SPARQL
Monday, 24 November 2014
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: When to dive into technical details
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- RE: Hydra and Shapes
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
Saturday, 22 November 2014
Friday, 21 November 2014
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: Role of SPARQL
- Re: When to dive into technical details
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
Thursday, 20 November 2014
- Question on User Story S33: Normalizing data
- Role of SPARQL
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- When to dive into technical details
- Re: Glossary for the working group
- Re: Glossary for the working group
- RE: Glossary for the working group
- Re: Glossary for the working group
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 and 12 November 2014
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 and 12 November 2014
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 and 12 November 2014
- RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 and 12 November 2014
- Regrets for teleconference
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
Wednesday, 19 November 2014
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 20 November 2014
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 20 November 2014
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Glossary for the working group
- Re: Glossary for the working group
- Re: Glossary for the working group
- Re: Glossary for the working group
- Re: Glossary for the working group
- Re: Glossary for the working group
- Glossary for the working group
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- User Story: LDP: POST content to Container of a certain shape
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Reusable Shapes
- Re: Reusable Shapes
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Reusable Shapes
- Re: isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: Reusable Shapes (was: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations)
- Reusable Shapes (was: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations)
- isolating shapes in named graphs
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Combining multiple queries for execution
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Combining multiple queries for execution
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Introduction
- Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience?
Tuesday, 18 November 2014
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience?
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience?
- Introduction
- Re: Fwd: Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Fwd: Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-3 (Shape association): How is a shape associated with a graph?
- rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience?
- rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-1 (Entailment regime): What is the entailment regime?
- Re: Hydra and Shapes
Monday, 17 November 2014
Friday, 14 November 2014
Thursday, 13 November 2014
- Re: Renumbered rdf:List stress test user story
- AW: CORRECTION: Weekly WG call set on Thusrday 2pm ET starting next week on 20 November
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: More examples
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Renumbered rdf:List stress test user story
- More examples
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
Wednesday, 12 November 2014
- Building on parts of RDFS (was: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations)
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Renumbered rdf:List stress test user story
- RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- RE: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
- RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
Tuesday, 11 November 2014
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
- RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
- RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 12 November (Wednesday!!)
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 12 November (Wednesday!!)
- RE: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
- RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 12 November (Wednesday!!)
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
- CORRECTION: Weekly WG call set on Thusrday 2pm ET starting next week on 20 November
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
- Re: Weekly WG call now set on Thusrday 2pm ET!!
- Re: Weekly WG call now set on Thusrday 2pm ET!!
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
- Re: Weekly WG call now set on Thusrday 2pm ET!!
- Weekly WG call now set on Thusrday 2pm ET!!
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
- Re: SPARQL equivalence semantics
- Re: SPARQL equivalence semantics
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
Monday, 10 November 2014
- Re: Extending SPIN with meta-templates
- Re: SPARQL equivalence semantics
- test case for term equivalence
- Re: SPARQL equivalence semantics
- SPARQL equivalence semantics
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
Saturday, 8 November 2014
Friday, 7 November 2014
- Re: unlikely to make the WG meeting on the 12th
- Poll for WG weekly calls schedule
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Weekly phone call times
- Re: Weekly phone call times
- Re: AW: Re: Weekly phone call times
- Re: Weekly phone call times
- Re: AW: Re: Weekly phone call times
- AW: Re: Weekly phone call times
- Re: Weekly phone call times
- Re: unlikely to make the WG meeting on the 12th
- Re: Weekly phone call times
- Re: unlikely to make the WG meeting on the 12th
- unlikely to make the WG meeting on the 12th
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: AW: Weekly phone call times
- Re: Weekly phone call times
- Re: Weekly phone call times
- AW: Weekly phone call times
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Weekly phone call times
Thursday, 6 November 2014
- Extending SPIN with meta-templates (was: Can Shapes always be Classes?)
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- RE: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: RDFS domain/range issues
- Re: RDFS domain/range issues
- Re: RDFS domain/range issues
- Re: RDFS domain/range issues
- AW: Re: Use Cases wiki pages
- Re: Use Cases wiki pages
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
Wednesday, 5 November 2014
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: RDFS domain/range issues
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- Shapes, Individuals, and Classes - OSLC Motivations
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- rdfdatashapestracker-ACTION-1: Copy User stories from piratepad to Wiki
- Re: Technology options
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Re: RDFS domain/range issues
- Re: RDFS domain/range issues
- Re: RDFS domain/range issues
- Re: Technology options
- Re: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- RE: Can Shapes always be Classes?
- Can Shapes always be Classes?
- The SKOS constraint checking use case
- Re: Use Cases wiki pages
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2014
- Re: RDFS domain/range issues
Tuesday, 4 November 2014
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2014
- Re: Use Cases wiki pages
- Re: Use Cases wiki pages
- Re: Use Cases wiki pages
- RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2014
- Re: Use Cases wiki pages
- Use Cases wiki pages
- Re: RDFS domain/range issues (was: a view of SPIN constraints)
- Re: Technology options
- Re: a view of SPIN constraints
- Re: a view of SPIN constraints
- RDFS domain/range issues (was: a view of SPIN constraints)
- Re: a view of SPIN constraints
- Re: a view of SPIN constraints
- Re: a view of SPIN constraints