public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from December 2014 by date

Sunday, 28 December 2014

• Re: shapes as classes Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken
• Re: shapes as classes Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken

Monday, 29 December 2014

• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Karen Coyle
• shapes-ISSUE-20 (S2 ShExC calling): ShExC example in S2 doesn't indicate how to set it up RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 28 December 2014

• Re: shapes as classes Eric Prud'hommeaux

Tuesday, 23 December 2014

• Re: shapes as classes Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes as classes Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Irene Polikoff
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Karen Coyle
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Irene Polikoff
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Irene Polikoff

Monday, 22 December 2014

• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Irene Polikoff
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Irene Polikoff
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 21 December 2014

• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required Holger Knublauch
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 20 December 2014

• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes as classes Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• trying to understand the proposed solutions (OWL constraints, SPIN, ShEx, OSLC Resource Shapes, ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Karen Coyle
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Karen Coyle
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: resources (RDF, that is) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: resources (RDF, that is) Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes as classes Karen Coyle
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 19 December 2014

• Issue management Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: shapes as classes Holger Knublauch
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: shapes as classes Arthur Ryman
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Arthur Ryman
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• shapes-ISSUE-19 (S35 not RDF): S35 appeals to something that is not RDF RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: On managing our Requirements wiki page Solbrig, Harold R.
• Re: On managing our Requirements wiki page Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Arthur Ryman
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes as classes Arthur Ryman
• Re: shapes as classes Arthur Ryman
• Re: ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource Arthur Ryman
• Re: ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource Arthur Ryman
• Re: resources (RDF, that is) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: On managing our Requirements wiki page Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: resources (RDF, that is) Holger Knublauch
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• On managing our Requirements wiki page Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-17 (S19 and S20 ontologies): S19 and S20 need information to distinguish from ontology recognition RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-16 (S18 constraints?): S18 does not appear to be about constraints RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-15 (S17 constraint?): S17 is about access not constraints RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-14 (S14 constraints?): S14 might be about change not constraints RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-13 (S12 no constraints): it is not apparent where S12 involves constraints RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-12 (S10 story upgrade): S10 needs a better story RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-11 (S9 impossible): S9 is about existing but unspecified values RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-10 (S8 no story): S8 does not have a story RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-9 (S7 no story): S7 does not appear to have a story RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-8 (S6 Clarification ): S6 doesn't clearly state what feature is required RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-7 (S4 no story): Story S4 is missing a story RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-6 (ShExC example): Story S2 - upgrade ShExC part RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 18 December 2014

• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes as classes Holger Knublauch
• Data Shapes WG Minutes for 18 December 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Axel Polleres
• Re: ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource Axel Polleres
• Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource Arthur Ryman
• Re: shapes as classes Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: shape programs [was Re: shapes as classes] Arthur Ryman
• Re: shapes as classes Arthur Ryman
• Re: Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Moved S38 into S13 Holger Knublauch
• Re: Moved S38 into S13 Michel Dumontier
• Re: resources (RDF, that is) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014 Karen Coyle
• Moved S38 into S13 Holger Knublauch
• Re: resources (RDF, that is) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: resources (RDF, that is) Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 17 December 2014

• Re: Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: associating RDF nodes with shapes Irene Polikoff
• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Karen Coyle
• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: associating RDF nodes with shapes Irene Polikoff
• Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 December 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Karen Coyle
• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Karen Coyle
• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Holger Knublauch
• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Holger Knublauch
• RE: associating RDF nodes with shapes Irene Polikoff
• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: associating RDF nodes with shapes Irene Polikoff
• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: associating RDF nodes with shapes Irene Polikoff

Tuesday, 16 December 2014

• Re: associating RDF nodes with shapes Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes as classes Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Karen Coyle
• associating RDF nodes with shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• resources (RDF, that is) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 15 December 2014

• Re: shapes as classes Holger Knublauch
• Re: shape programs [was Re: shapes as classes] Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Holger Knublauch
• shape programs [was Re: shapes as classes] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Arthur Ryman
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Simon Steyskal
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes as classes Holger Knublauch

Saturday, 13 December 2014

• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes as classes Holger Knublauch

Friday, 12 December 2014

• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes as classes Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AW: Re: Adding info of issue id to wiki pages Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes as classes Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes as classes Ralph TQ [Gmail]
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Ralph TQ [Gmail]
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes as classes Ralph TQ [Gmail]
• Re: shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AW: Re: Adding info of issue id to wiki pages Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• AW: Re: Adding info of issue id to wiki pages Simon Steyskal
• Re: ISSUE-I Wiki Page Created Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Adding info of issue id to wiki pages Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Adding info of issue id to wiki pages Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Adding info of issue id to wiki pages Simon Steyskal
• Re: Adding info of issue id to wiki pages Holger Knublauch
• Adding info of issue id to wiki pages Simon Steyskal
• Re: Data Shapes WG Minutes for 11 December 2014 Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Simon Steyskal
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 11 December 2014

• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-I Wiki Page Created Arthur Ryman
• Re: Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Data Shapes WG Minutes for 11 December 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• AUTO: Bart van Leeuwen is niet aanwezig / Bart van Leeuwen is out of the office. (returning 15-12-2014) Bart van Leeuwen
• Re: shapes as classes Holger Knublauch
• Re: Some DC requirements Holger Knublauch
• Re: Some DC requirements Holger Knublauch
• shapes-ACTION-5: New wiki page for requirements (probably only with a few to start) RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Requirements editing Arthur Ryman
• Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs) Karen Coyle
• shapes as classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs) Arthur Ryman
• Re: Some DC requirements Karen Coyle
• Re: Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014 Arthur Ryman
• Re: Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 December 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Some DC requirements Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Some DC requirements Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Some DC requirements Karen Coyle
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Arthur Ryman
• regrets for today's telco Axel Polleres
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Arthur Ryman
• Re: Some DC requirements Karen Coyle
• Re: Some DC requirements Steve Speicher
• Re: Some DC requirements Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Some DC requirements Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-5 (Resource Shape Association): How is a resource associated with shapes? Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 December 2014 Simon Steyskal
• Requirements editing Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 10 December 2014

• Re: Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 December 2014 Holger Knublauch
• Re: Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 December 2014 Holger Knublauch
• Re: Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 December 2014 Michel Dumontier
• Re: Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 December 2014 Karen Coyle
• Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 December 2014 Arnaud Le Hors

Tuesday, 9 December 2014

• Re: stories with external pointers Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 8 December 2014

• Re: condensing the stories Holger Knublauch
• Re: stories with external pointers Holger Knublauch
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 6 December 2014

• Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 5 December 2014

• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Data Shapes WG Draft minutes for 30-31 October 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: AW: Re: ISSUE 1: Created a Wiki Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• AW: Re: ISSUE 1: Created a Wiki Simon Steyskal
• AW: tracker brittleness Simon Steyskal
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE 1: Created a Wiki Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• tracker brittleness Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• stories with external pointers Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• condensing the stories Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Eric Prud'hommeaux
• ISSUE 2: Created a Wiki Simon Steyskal
• ISSUE 1: Created a Wiki Simon Steyskal
• Re: Global property constraints Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Global property constraints Holger Knublauch
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Holger Knublauch
• Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs) Dean Allemang
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Dean Allemang
• Re: Global property constraints Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Compact Syntax: Normative exchange syntax or best practice for tools? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Compact Syntax: Normative exchange syntax or best practice for tools? Holger Knublauch
• Data Shapes WG Minutes for 4 December 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-5 (Resource Shape Association): How is a resource associated with shapes? Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 4 December 2014

• shapes-ISSUE-5 (Resource Shape Association): How is a resource associated with shapes? RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• Namespace prefixes Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ACTION-4: Create new wiki page for issue-3, seeded with his email message Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes-ACTION-4: Create new wiki page for issue-3, seeded with his email message Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Global property constraints Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ACTION-4: Create new wiki page for issue-3, seeded with his email message Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Holger Knublauch
• shapes-ACTION-4: Create new wiki page for issue-3, seeded with his email message RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ACTION-3: Will create a new issue to describe the aspect of issue-3 that discuss the nature of shape resources RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ACTION-2: Will investigate how to get requirements into the wiki RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Arthur Ryman
• Re: interoperability (was Re: isolating shapes in named graphs) Arthur Ryman
• Re: Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 November 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• capabilities of constraints Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-3 (Shape association): How is a shape associated with a graph? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-3 (Shape association): How is a shape associated with a graph? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Global property constraints (was: Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN) Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 November 2014 Holger Knublauch
• Re: Global property constraints (was: Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN) Holger Knublauch
• Re: Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 November 2014 Simon Steyskal
• Re: Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 November 2014 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 November 2014 Simon Steyskal
• Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-3 (Shape association): How is a shape associated with a graph? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Global property constraints (was: Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN) Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-3 (Shape association): How is a shape associated with a graph? Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 November 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 November 2014 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 3 December 2014

• Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-3 (Shape association): How is a shape associated with a graph? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Data Shapes WG agenda for 4 December 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• Data Shapes WG Minutes for 20 November 2014 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed Simon Steyskal
• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Holger Knublauch
• Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-3 (Shape association): How is a shape associated with a graph? Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 2 December 2014

• Re: Stand-alone Shapes and oslc:valueRange implemented in SPIN Arthur Ryman
• Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-3 (Shape association): How is a shape associated with a graph? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Issue Tracker fixed Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Can Shapes always be Classes? Arthur Ryman
• Re: Change of RDF Data Shapes WG F2F2 dates Arthur Ryman

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 December 2014 20:27:00 UTC