- From: Richard Tibbett via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:58:03 +0000
- To: public-dap-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/2009/dap/calendar
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv2769
Modified Files:
Overview.html
Log Message:
First editor's draft of Calendar API
Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2009/dap/calendar/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -d -r1.4 -r1.5
--- Overview.html 15 Oct 2009 15:57:05 -0000 1.4
+++ Overview.html 22 Jan 2010 13:58:01 -0000 1.5
@@ -1,55 +1,1181 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
- <head>
- <title>The Calendar API</title>
- <meta http-equiv='Content-Type' content='text/html;charset=utf-8'/>
- <script src='../ReSpec.js/js/simple-node.js' class='remove'></script>
- <script src='../ReSpec.js/js/shortcut.js' class='remove'></script>
- <script src='../ReSpec.js/js/respec.js' class='remove'></script>
- <script src='../ReSpec.js/bibref/biblio.js' class='remove'></script>
- <script class='remove'>
- var respecConfig = {
[...1196 lines suppressed...]
+ complexity of their common elements, and that VJOURNAL is entirely a subset of those,
+ it seems to me there is very little to gain by removing VTODO and VJOURNAL from this specification.
+ Removal might restrict clients from implementing some potentially useful functionality.
+ The other supporting components of the specification like VALARM and VTIMEZONE seem to me so essential
+ in any reasonable implementation of VEVENT that they don't even merit discussion."
+ </blockquote>
+ </div>
+ </section>
<section class='appendix'>
<h2>Acknowledgements</h2>
<p>
- ...
+ The editors would like to thank the input from the PhoneGap, Nokia, and OMTP BONDI groups and the feedback received from W3C DAP members to date ...
</p>
</section>
- </body>
+
+ </body>
</html>
Received on Friday, 22 January 2010 13:58:05 UTC