- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:52:12 -0700
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, public-cwm-talk@w3.org, Owen Sacco <owen.sacco@deri.org>
On 4/15/12 2:41 PM, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:48:09 +0100 > Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote: > >> tl;dr: content-location trumps request-uri. > > As per RFC 2616, true. > > But in practice, most browsers have never implemented this. Some HTTP > libraries do though. (libwww-perl does.) There are Internet drafts > planned to obsolete RFC 2616, and these change Content-Location's de > jure behaviour to match that of browsers. > > See http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/154 > For your information I ddid consider this a bug in raptor since it handled the Content-Location: header but not a relative URI in C-L. This is fixed in GIT (will be 2.0.8) Dave
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2012 22:52:49 UTC