- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:07:23 -0600
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Cc: public-cwm-talk@w3.org
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 01:39 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > I'm down to about 17 failures. I think my parser is compliant now, i.e. as of rev 144:f8638002afd5 . http://code.google.com/p/swap-scala/source/detail?r=f8638002afd5523a70016dedfdb101cead824dee Updated EARL report: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2010Feb/att-0018/_earl.rdf http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2010Feb/0018.html It shows some XMLLiteral failures (#101, #102, #103) and one for Test #134 Uppercase reserved words. I consider the XMLLiteral problems limitations of the test harness; I suggest more subtle SPARQL queries. I don't recommend a strict canonical-xml requirement on RDFa parsers; I hope we can find some equivalence test from XQuery that will serve better. As I said in my recent comment, I don't see any justification in the spec for test #134. > make that: http://dckc-swap.appspot.com/index.html > > > Its Crazy Ivan interface is: > > http://dckc-swap.appspot.com/rdfa?addr= -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 03:07:26 UTC