- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:39:21 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-cwm-talk@w3.org
Paths have been in N3 for a long time and much discussed. The characters used are "!" and "^". A discussion of the options is in http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/N3Alternatives#Syntax It would be a really bad idea not to use the same punctuation in SPARQL. Could you pass that on? Tim PS: Note also ^ is related to ^^ in that ^^ can be regarded as ^ if you want to reify datatypes -- to make an RDF system which uses only strings. On 2010-01 -22, at 22:10, Dan Connolly wrote: > The SPARQL WG is looking at paths... > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/property-paths/Overview.xml > > ... which is quite important for querying, e.g. lists: > > select ?elt where { <alist> rdf:rest*/rdf:first ?elt } > > Meanwhile, they're using / where n3 uses ., I think. > > They use ^ both as N3 uses it and to do the is/of thing. > > They also include regex syntax such as +,*, ? and {n,m} > and ()s (but not for match groups). > > It's pretty hard to argue against this in SPARQL; people > have been asking for it from the very start of the SPARQL > design. > > Perhaps N3 should adapt in this direction? > > The one place I'm inclined to push on is is/of; I'd > hate to lose that from N3. Though... with the @keywords > mechanism, maybe it's not so much of a conflict. > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 11:36:32 UTC