- From: Barclay, Daniel <daniel@fgm.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:09:53 -0400
- To: <public-cwm-talk@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4A79AED1.2090700@fgm.com>
For any future editions of the N3 specification currently at http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/n3/ (http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-n3-20080114/), there are a number of editorial errors. Here are some from the Introduction and Grammar sections: In the Introduction section: * It says: This language has ben developed ... * It says: This is a language which is a compact and readable alternative ... (That "which" should be "that.") * It says: The developer learning N3 is invited to try the A tutorial ... * It says ... URI abbreviation using prefixes which are bound to a namespace (using @prefix) a bit like in XML... (A comma seems to be missing before "a bit" (that the "which" should be "that" or should have a comma before it).) In the Grammar section: * It says: The grammar of N3 is defined by a context free grammar: * Context-free grammar in N3 (The (first) reference to "context free grammar" should have the hyphen too.) * It says: N3 files are encoded in UTF-8 (See RFC2279), in normalized in Normalization Form C. (Note the second occurrence of "in.") * It says: A full 32 unicode implementation would normally be preferable. Also, the formatting of the non-normative text with both a reduced-contrast color _and_ a reduced-contrast background color makes it harder to read. Please consider ???? Additionally, the text of the third paragraph of the "Status ..." section is in a fairly pale gray. -- (Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:09:50 UTC