- From: Stan Devitt <stan.devitt@agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 15:24:23 -0400
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, public-cwm-talk@w3.org, public-cwm-talk-request@w3.org
There are two important things to note: 1. The current n3 grammar defines this four term structure in terms of the tokens @is and @of. This re-interpretatation in terms of "is" and "of" relies on aliasing. 2. Because @is and @of participate in a very different grammatical structure from (say) simple name tokens this complicates the aliasing mechanism considerably. There is now more than one possible grammatical role for the target of the alias so the actual tokenizing is changed by the aliasing. I would be happier if either aliasing were not involved, or at least did not change the tokenizing. Can someone comment on this? Stan Devitt Agfa Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> Sent by: public-cwm-talk-request@w3.org 05/28/2005 05:03 AM Please respond to Danny Ayers To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> cc: public-cwm-talk@w3.org, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, (bcc: Stan Devitt/AWKCT/CAN/AGFA/CA/BAYER) Subject: Re: is/of feature of N3 in turtle/sparql? Dan, I've still not spent any proper time with cwm (for shame!), could you please just clarify is/of: * It's a convenience rather than introducing anything new? * Would this be correct - select ?x where { :EricDoc dc:creator ?x } select ?x where { ?x is dc:creator of :EricDoc } would produce the same results? Cheers, Danny. On 5/28/05, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > I just realized the other day that SPARQL doesn't have is/of, > nor does turtle... > > 22:48:25 <DanC> ^sparqlquery select ?pg where { [ foaf:nick "DanC"] is > cyc:socialParticipants of [ contact:homePage ?pg] } > 22:48:25 <julie> Bad query (SPARQL syntax error at 'i') > 22:48:38 <dajobe> that's not in sparql - is, of > 22:48:38 <DanC> oh frap. no is/of in SPARQL > http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/discovery/chatlogs/swig/2005-05-19.html#T22 > -48-25 > > Hmm. > > I'm hoping the WG will close all the remaining issues, including > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax , > in the next week or so. In particular, punctuiationSyntax is pretty > much all set to go this Tuesday. So it would be good to get feedback > on this right away. In particular, if you want is/of in, send > something to public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org . > > refs: > > N3 primer, on is/of etc. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Primer > SPARQL http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ > turtle http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/discovery/2004/01/turtle/ > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > > > -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Saturday, 28 May 2005 19:24:42 UTC