- From: Jones, David H <david.h.jones@boeing.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:32:24 -0700
- To: <public-cwm-talk@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <80A0914E4AFDE145B3888E6A107CF65A044DC632@xch-nw-05.nw.nos.boeing.com>
I was under the impression that I could include an rdfs or owl rule set and get the inferences implied by the semantics of these languages. For example, using the attached files and the command line below I get rdfs inference for sub/superclass: python ..\cwm.py aircraft1.n3 http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/rdfs-rules.n3 --think -filter=ac-rules2.n3 This does not work with http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/owl-rules.n3 Can someone explain what I should be doing? Are these the right rule sets to be using? Also, I thought from descriptions in the tutorial that log:semantic would read the contents of the file and put the contents in the store. For example: {<http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/rdfs-rules.n3> log:semantics ?c} => {?c a :rdfs-rules}. {<http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/owl-rules.n3> log:semantics ?c} => {?c a :owl-rules}. Cwm appears to read these files and add them to the store, but inferences based on these rule sets don't occur. Do I understand this correctly? Is there another way I should be using log:semantic? <<ac-rules2.n3>> <<aircraft1.n3>> Regards, David H. Jones Boeing Phantom Works, Mathematics & Computing Technology 425-865-6924 425-865-2964 (FAX) david.h.jones@boeing.com
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: ac-rules2.n3
- application/octet-stream attachment: aircraft1.n3
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 23:33:00 UTC