- From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 15:38:57 +0100
- To: timbl@w3.org
- Cc: public-cwm-bugs@w3.org
> The DAWG today decided they wanted to be able to use N3 syntax but > allow "." in qnames (not as trailing). This would rqeuire for > compatability a change to the n3 grammar, complete elimination of the > "." for path, and some look ahead in the lexer. > > I guess we should try it out (a) in notation3.py, (b) in n3/n3 and (c) > in the scheduled topic chat. I have tried that in euler and it actually works fine for all 492 tests http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2003/03swap/etc1.n3 http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2003/03swap/etc2.n3 http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2003/03swap/etc3.n3 The object of the triple in http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/syntax/embedded-dot-in-qname.n3 is foo:sushi.food and the object of the triple in http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/syntax/trailing-dot-in-qname.n3 is foo:sushi (almost finished my sententence with trailing dot :)) > Tim -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2005 14:39:38 UTC