Re: Allow (non-trailing) "." in qnames?

> The DAWG today decided they wanted to be able to use N3 syntax but 
> allow "." in qnames (not as trailing). This would rqeuire for 
> compatability a change to the n3 grammar, complete elimination of the 
> "." for path, and some look ahead in the lexer.
>
> I guess we should try it out (a) in notation3.py, (b) in n3/n3 and (c) 
> in the scheduled topic chat.

I have tried that in euler and it actually works fine for all 492 tests
http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2003/03swap/etc1.n3
http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2003/03swap/etc2.n3
http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2003/03swap/etc3.n3

The object of the triple in
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/syntax/embedded-dot-in-qname.n3
is foo:sushi.food

and the object of the triple in
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/syntax/trailing-dot-in-qname.n3
is foo:sushi

(almost finished my sententence with trailing dot :))

> Tim

-- 
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Sunday, 6 March 2005 14:39:38 UTC