Re: string escapes reverted on purpose? from Stan Devitt on 2005-06-21 (public-cwm-bugs@w3.org from June 2005)

From: Stan Devitt <stan.devitt@agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:43:10 -0400
To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: EspeonEefi <eefi@MIT.EDU>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, public-cwm-bugs@w3.org, public-cwm-bugs-request@w3.org, Yosi Scharf <syosi@MIT.EDU>
Message-ID: <OFF3C8F6CD.67BA0783-ON85257027.006BEF67-85257027.006C5269@agfa.com>

In this regard,  is the plan to introduce the notion of a prolog into n3 
as
has been used in the SPARQL grammar ?  That would certainly help clarify 
where and when aliases (for example) can be used.

Stan 





Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Sent by: public-cwm-bugs-request@w3.org
06/21/2005 10:55 AM

 
        To:     EspeonEefi <eefi@MIT.EDU>
        cc:     public-cwm-bugs@w3.org, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, Yosi Scharf 
<syosi@MIT.EDU>, (bcc: Stan Devitt/AWKCT/CAN/AGFA/CA/BAYER)
        Subject:        Re: string escapes reverted on purpose?



It's important to coordinate N3 lexical details like this with turtle 
and SPARQL.
Have you talked with Yosi about this part of n3.n3 and the parser
work he and EricP are doing?

Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2005 19:43:16 UTC