[closed] Re: iterable argument required - bug?

Now fixed in cvs.

The test is regression.n3#t1048b

>> Timbl, what should the behavior be? Currently if the file has either 
>> error cwm throws an exception. Should it do that? Should it keep 
>> going?
> It may be useful to have  an option of warnings when a bizarre 
> combination of types comes up in a builtin's args, as they are often 
> rule-writer's error. But logically, the builtin just returns no 
> bindings.


Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 10:31:26 UTC