- From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:43:09 +0100
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: public-cwm-bugs@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 01:12 +0100, jos.deroo@agfa.com wrote: > [...] >> which is what I would expect > > Did you update just today? I checked in a fix just I'm almost daily doing a checkout of WWW/2000/10/swap and yesterday I was planning to test @ie Was also testing conversion to RDF/XML of [ owl:sameAs "s"^^xsd:string] :p :o. to have literal as subject <rdf:Description> <p rdf:resource="http://example.org/eg#o"/> <owl:sameAs rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">s</owl:sameAs> </rdf:Description> and [ owl:sameAs """{?a ?b ?c. ?d ?e ?f} log:implies {?s ?p ?o}."""^^log:Formula] a log:Truth. to have N3 formula asserted <rdf:Description> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#Truth"/> <sameAs rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#Formula">{?a ?b ?c. ?d ?e ?f} log:implies {?s ?p ?o}.</sameAs> </rdf:Description> > after I filed the bug. But I haven't written a test, > nor have I fixed the other math: routines. so we had kind of luck to test that fix :) -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Sunday, 19 December 2004 12:43:46 UTC