- From: aannane <amina.annane@irit.fr>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:18:26 +0200
- To: "public-csvw@w3.org" <public-csvw@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <E1mYVAN-0005NW-Vs@titan.w3.org>
Hello,
I have a small question about the CSVW vocabulary (https://www.w3.org/ns/csvw):
According to the published documentation, the "CSVW" schema is the same as the "Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data" schema, however "Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data" is a recommendation while "CSVW" is an internal document « This document is merely a W3C-internal document. It has no official standing of any kind and does not represent consensus of the W3C Membership… »
Could you please clarify this for me? (I mean why CSVW is not a recommandation as he has the same schema as "Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data")
Thank you
Best regards,
--
Amina ANNANE
PostDoc at MELODI team – IRIT laboratory
University of Paul Sabatier
TOULOUSE FRANCE
amina.annane@irit.fr
--_126EC7FC-0750-44CC-8FC2-3EF08840C270_
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Pr\00E9format\00E9 HTML Car";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
span.PrformatHTMLCar
{mso-style-name:"Pr\00E9format\00E9 HTML Car";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Pr\00E9format\00E9 HTML";
font-family:"Courier New";}
..MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=FR style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Hello,</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I have a small question about the CSVW vocabulary (https://www.w3.org/ns/csvw):</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>According to the published documentation, the "CSVW" schema is the same as the "Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data" schema, however "Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data" is a recommendation while "CSVW" is an internal document « This document is merely a W3C-internal document. It has no official standing of any kind and does not represent consensus of the W3C Membership… »</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Could you please clarify this for me? (I mean why CSVW is not a recommandation as he has the same schema as "Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data")</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thank you</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Best regards,</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><pre>-- </pre><pre>Amina ANNANE</pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre>PostDoc at MELODI team – IRIT laboratory</pre><pre>University of Paul Sabatier</pre><pre>TOULOUSE FRANCE</pre><pre>amina.annane@irit.fr </pre><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>
--_126EC7FC-0750-44CC-8FC2-3EF08840C270_--
Received on Friday, 8 October 2021 17:35:54 UTC