- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:10:03 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- CC: public-csvw@w3.org,Jürgen Umbrich <juergen.umbrich@wu.ac.at>
Received on Friday, 18 November 2016 16:11:44 UTC
DCAT might be a good hook, indeed... Maybe worthwhile to bring this up at the upcoming vocab workshop... Thanks, Axel âŁ(sent from mobile) Axel Polleres -- url: http://www.polleres.net/ twitter: @AxelPolleres​ On 18 Nov 2016, 16:13, at 16:13, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: >> On Nov 18, 2016, at 1:58 AM, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@wu.ac.at> >wrote: >> >> We just discussed here whether there'd be a need for metadata to >annotate the sorting order of CSV files, i.e. means to express that a >certain CSV is sorted/grouped by columns x,y,z. >> >> I guess for processing larger CSV files having this information >available could be quite useful metadata. Opinions? > >Would you see this affecting the serialization in some way? Simple >annotation? If annotation, can this be achieved using Common >Properties? I would think so. I can’t think of an existing vocabulary >to express this information, but perhaps an extension to DCAT? > >Gregg > >> Axel >> -- >> Prof. Dr. Axel Polleres >> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna >> url: http://www.polleres.net/ twitter: @AxelPolleres >> >>
Received on Friday, 18 November 2016 16:11:44 UTC