- From: Yakov Shafranovich <yakov@noom.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:20:34 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
I have used XSL-FO in the past for PDF production, I believe Apache has a free processor (FOP). On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > >> On 23 Nov 2015, at 15:54, Yakov Shafranovich <yakov@noom.com> wrote: >> >> I think PDF usage is still more widespread then ePub is. > > True. And one does not exclude the other, by the way, I just do not have the tool on my machine to produce a proper PDF. > > Ivan > >> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >>> Just for the fun of it:-) >>> >>> I have implemented a separate service that produces an EPUB 3 version of a >>> /TR document. (After all, the other hat I wear at W3C is in digital >>> publishing.) It also so happens that I used the CSV document as tests, too… >>> >>> Should we publish with EPUB as an alternative format? In the old days PDF >>> was used (and could still be used but I do not know what processor to use >>> for that), EPUB is better if, eg, somebody wants to read the standard on a >>> tablet. >>> >>> (Needless to say I can take care of the generation of the EPUB) >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> ---- >>> Ivan Herman, W3C >>> Digital Publishing Lead >>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > >
Received on Monday, 23 November 2015 15:21:44 UTC