Re: CSVW WG requests PR transition

Uh . . . was anything done to address the editorial issues that I 
raised?  I don't see any changes in the current draft:
https://w3c.github.io/csvw/syntax/#locating-metadata
The specific wording that I suggested for addressing them was rejected, 
but I neither saw any alternate wording proposed instead, nor do I now 
see any relevant changes.  The issues were:

1. The standard metadata filename feature is not listed at the beginning 
of section 5 where a reader would expect it, in the itemized list of 
"methods of locating metadata".

2. The title of section 5.3, which defines that feature, also fails to 
mention it.

3. Readers are not apprised of the risks of using the .well-known feature.

Did I miss something?   Am I looking at a wrong version?

David Booth


On 11/04/2015 10:33 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> CSVW WG, Ivan,
>
> In today's meeting, we voted unanimously to request a transition to
> Proposed Recommendation.
>
> RESOLVED: The WG resolves that its work on "Model for Tabular Data and
> Metadata on the Web", "Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data",
> “Generating RDF from Tabular Data on the Web” and “Generating JSON from
> Tabular Data on the Web” is complete and requests that W3C advance them
> to Proposed Recommendation status.
> URLs:
> http://w3c.github.io/csvw/syntax/index.html?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24
> http://w3c.github.io/csvw/metadata/index.html?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24
> http://w3c.github.io/csvw/csv2rdf/?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24
> http://w3c.github.io/csvw/csv2rdf/?specStatus=PR;publishDate=2014-11-24#h-sotd
>
>
> Logs: http://www.w3.org/2015/11/04-csvw-irc#T15-20-09
>
> Draft minutes are at http://www.w3.org/2015/11/04-csvw-minutes.html - we
> had some complications because WebEx would not start for us, so we
> conducted the meeting textually in IRC.
>
> Thanks everyone for getting us to this milestone :)
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan

Received on Thursday, 5 November 2015 03:11:36 UTC