Re: Regrets

> On Jul 22, 2015, at 6:56 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't think we're quorate today; perhaps Gregg and I will chat.
> Issues we all might discuss in email:
> 
> 1. blog post - I started a google doc towards this but it emerged that
> W3C's homepage news was going to carry all the basic info I'd planned.
> Let's talk about a more creative / immersive post that draws people
> into the topic.
> 
> 2. test cases - I believe we ought to consider them approved.
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-csv-wg/2015Jul/0056.html
> is lacking some +1s though. We should all write down our +1s for the
> record.

This is now gathered in https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/683. A few more +1s would be good before closing out and merging the changes, just for good form.

> 3. tell everyone you know - in the last major milestone we mailed a
> pile of lists. We should do the same with the CRs. Let's share that
> out.

We need some follow-through on the folks that said they would do implementations. Even a partial implementation would be useful, as it might goad on others.

Gregg

> Looking at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2015Apr/0050.html
> I can handle public-lod, semantic-web, public-schemaorg and related
> W3C CGs. Where else should we circulate the announcement?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 22 July 2015 at 07:43, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Almost same for me. No this week; yes next week; no for the following week.
>> Apologies; but I'm looking forward to my summer holiday in a couple of
>> weeks!
>> 
>> Jeremy
>> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 at 07:41, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Sorry guys, I'm in an all day meeting today so won't make the call. I will
>>> be around next week, then off for two.
>>> 
>>> Jeni
>

Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2015 14:11:20 UTC