- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:49:14 +0200
- To: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Message-Id: <3C107326-3071-4CA8-B48F-FD8092BB5D91@w3.org>
15:00 London time, whatever the right abbreviation is... In a bit more than an hour. Ivan > On 08 Apr 2015, at 14:26 , Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi - can anyone confirm if we’re meeting at 15:00 GMT (UTC) or 15:00 BST? Many thanks, Jeremy > > >> On 7 Apr 2015, at 20:51, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi - I'll be dialling for tomorrow's call ... back from vacation :-) >> >> I have two outstanding issues [1][2] assigned to me that I should get resolved tomorrow. Nothing major - so 16th April looks good. >> >> Jeremy >> >> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/445 >> [2]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/459 >> >> On 7 April 2015 at 15:05, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> Dan, >> >> as far as I am concerned, all the issues I raised during my review are closed. Ie, if we can handle, both decision wise and editorially, Jeni's comments tomorrow, I am o.k. to publish next week. >> >> Ivan >> >> > On 07 Apr 2015, at 15:36 , Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >> > >> > Last week Ivan, Gregg and I had an informal call. >> > >> > Super brief IRC log here, http://www.w3.org/2015/04/01-csvw-irc >> > >> > We talked somewhat more than scribed, but the main point of record was >> > made by Ivan: >> > >> > "we have to be a little more administrative (final reviews etc) in >> > coming period. >> > coming back next week, we might be ready to have a publication on the >> > following tuesday. >> > … aiming at 16th April currently. unless Jeremy or Jeni hits a major >> > issue, it should be doable." >> > >> > Jeni/Jeremy, how are things looking editorially from your side? >> > >> > Those of us who are around - let's have a call tomorrow. >> > >> > Checking in on Github, I see 5 items from Jeni listed as requiring >> > teleconf attention (and none from anyone else): >> > >> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Requires+telcon+discussion%2Fdecision%22 >> > >> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/444 "Should tables have a schema annotation?" >> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/445 "Row annotations in conversion >> > specifications" >> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/446 "Inherited property annotations >> > on columns" >> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/448 "Is specifying default metadata >> > necessary?" >> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/449 "HTTP headers vs dialects" >> > >> > All of these have had some discussion in Github. Assuming we manage to >> > reach a resolution on each before or during tomorrow's call, does >> > publishing on April 16th still sound feasible? Other editors - can you >> > confirm that you have no further issues requiring teleconf discussion? >> > >> > Dan >> > >> > (around tomorrow, happy to chair) >> > >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C >> Digital Publishing Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 >> >> >> >> >> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2015 12:49:25 UTC