- From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 20:51:04 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Message-ID: <CADtUq_3s80T68-G2SH46aui8zVvLUwWNR4da_PADcJiBVyzSxw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi - I'll be dialling for tomorrow's call ... back from vacation :-) I have two outstanding issues [1][2] assigned to me that I should get resolved tomorrow. Nothing major - so 16th April looks good. Jeremy [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/445 [2]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/459 On 7 April 2015 at 15:05, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Dan, > > as far as I am concerned, all the issues I raised during my review are > closed. Ie, if we can handle, both decision wise and editorially, Jeni's > comments tomorrow, I am o.k. to publish next week. > > Ivan > > > On 07 Apr 2015, at 15:36 , Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > > > > Last week Ivan, Gregg and I had an informal call. > > > > Super brief IRC log here, http://www.w3.org/2015/04/01-csvw-irc > > > > We talked somewhat more than scribed, but the main point of record was > > made by Ivan: > > > > "we have to be a little more administrative (final reviews etc) in > > coming period. > > coming back next week, we might be ready to have a publication on the > > following tuesday. > > … aiming at 16th April currently. unless Jeremy or Jeni hits a major > > issue, it should be doable." > > > > Jeni/Jeremy, how are things looking editorially from your side? > > > > Those of us who are around - let's have a call tomorrow. > > > > Checking in on Github, I see 5 items from Jeni listed as requiring > > teleconf attention (and none from anyone else): > > > > > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Requires+telcon+discussion%2Fdecision%22 > > > > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/444 "Should tables have a schema > annotation?" > > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/445 "Row annotations in conversion > > specifications" > > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/446 "Inherited property annotations > > on columns" > > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/448 "Is specifying default metadata > > necessary?" > > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/449 "HTTP headers vs dialects" > > > > All of these have had some discussion in Github. Assuming we manage to > > reach a resolution on each before or during tomorrow's call, does > > publishing on April 16th still sound feasible? Other editors - can you > > confirm that you have no further issues requiring teleconf discussion? > > > > Dan > > > > (around tomorrow, happy to chair) > > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 19:51:32 UTC