Question on a metadate choice rationale

At the moment, a column has three different designators in the metadata: "@id", "name", "title". What is the rationale to have all three of them? I can see the reason for differentiating title and the rest, because the former may be longer, may have different languages, etc. But I looks to me as if 'name' and '@id' play very similar role. (I realize that '@id' means unicity, but is it reasonable to expect that from 'name', too?)

In the mapping case this becomes a bit convoluted. At the moment it uses the 'name' to generate the different values, but that is a bit of an arbitrary choice, it could use '@id' as well. Mainly with the possible introduction of the URI templates (see separate thread with Jeremy), 'name' may become unnecessary IMHO.

Ivan



----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
GPG: 0x343F1A3D
WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me

Received on Saturday, 25 October 2014 14:09:45 UTC