Re: A draft outline for the CSV2RDF document

On May 19, 2014, at 9:16 AM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:

> On 19/05/14 15:23, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Let me try to see if I understand what you mean...
>> 
>> If there is no metadata assigned to the data then (at least conceptually) we say that we generate a metadata of, roughly, the form:
>> 
>> {
>>    "@id" : "URI OF THE DATA",
>>    "columns" : [{
>>      "name" : "col1",
>>      "template" : "{col1},
>>    },{
>>      "name" : "col2",
>>      "template" : "{col2},
>>    }]
>> }
> 
> Where we seem to differ is "template" - that's a template for one term (the object of a triple).
> 
> The template I have in mind is a complete row:
> 
> Taking from:
> 
> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/examples/simple-weather-observation.md
> 
> Date-time, Air temperature (Cel), Dew-point temperature (Cel)
> 2013-12-13T08:00:00Z, 	11.2, 	10.2
> 
> 
> <site/22580943/date-time/20131213T0800Z>
>    a ssn:Observation ;
>    ssn:observationSamplingTime
>        [ time:inXSDDateTime "2013-12-13T08:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime ] ;
>    ssn:observationResult [
>        a ssn:SensorOutput ;
>        def-op:airTemperature_C
>             [ qudt:numericValue "11.2"^^xsd:double ] ;
>        def-op:dewPointTemperature_C
>            [ qudt:numericValue "10.2"^^xsd:double ] ] .
> 
> That could be created with a template like:
> 
> ----------------------------------------------
> Columns:
> 
> "columns" : [{
>      "name" : "date-time"
>     },{
>      "name" : "air-temperature"
>     },{
>      "name" : "dew-point"
>   }]
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------
> <site/22580943/date-time/{date-time}>
>    a ssn:Observation ;
>    ssn:observationSamplingTime
>        [ time:inXSDDateTime "{date-time}"^^xsd:dateTime ] ;
>    ssn:observationResult [
>        a ssn:SensorOutput ;
>        def-op:airTemperature_C
>             [ qudt:numericValue "{air-temperature}"^^xsd:double ] ;
>        def-op:dewPointTemperature_C
>            [ qudt:numericValue "{dew-point}"^^xsd:double ] ] .
> ----------------------------------------------
> 
> skipping over the conversion of 2013-12-13T08:00:00Z to 20131213T0800Z

Yup! We construct a trivial template automatically, if none is supplied. By associating a mime-type with the template, we know how to process it further (XML, JSON, Turtle, ...).

Gregg

> 	Andy
> 
>> 
>> And, by doing that, we have only one generation algorithm instead of two branches like in my document now.
>> 
>> Yes, this works, I guess. It certainly makes the specification simpler and avoids getting out of sync. I am slightly worried that the end-user would be a bit screwed up, but that may have to go into a separate, tutorial-like text. So it may be worth doing it indeed...
>> 
>> (Would need a rewrite of the text I produced, but that is probably relatively easy; just that I would not do it today or tomorrow...)
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 19 May 2014, at 16:14 , Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 19/05/14 15:00, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>>>>> Generating a template, if none provided, would keep the user-template driven mechanism and metadata-gdefineeneated template mechanism in-step.  It would be clear that they aren't alternatives with (potentially) capabilities in the direct roue not in the template route.  You could get the generated template and tweak it, for example.
>>>>>> 
>>>> I would need an example to understand what you mean...
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> If the columns are "foo" and "bar" and no template is in the metadata then we define the process to be to create and use:
>>> 
>>> -------------------------
>>> [
>>>   :foo "{foo}" .
>>>   :bar "{bar}" .
>>> ]
>>> -------------------------
>>> 
>>> 	Andy
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
>> WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2014 23:40:12 UTC