- From: Alf Eaton <eaton.alf@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:38:29 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>, "D. Ceolin" <d.ceolin@vu.nl>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
On 22 March 2014 05:25, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > On 21 Mar 2014, at 21:46 , Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > >> >> On 21 Mar 2014 19:00, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> > >> > Dear all, >> > >> > I had to make some minor changes on the document to pass pubrules, like: >> > >> > I had to do some changes in the documents to make them conformant. >> > >> > - There were a number of URI-s to PDF-s that had #page=xxx fragment ID-s attached to them. Those are not legal fragment ID-s and, actually, the server did not react on them either... >> >> But fragments aren't sent to the server; they are interpreted client side. >> > > True. But client are expected to do something with those fragments if there is a registered meaning assigned to them. Is there such thing for PDF? Yes, as specified in <http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/acrobat/PDFOpenParameters.pdf#page=5> and <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3778#section-3>
Received on Saturday, 22 March 2014 09:39:17 UTC