Re: Some problems with the UCR document

Ivan,

Hmmm those missing image files are my use case, I'll find out the
problem and get them checked in.  Once I do so I'll send out a
notification.

Eric

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I had to make some minor changes on the document to pass pubrules, like:
>
> I had to do some changes in the documents to make them conformant.
>
> - There were a number of URI-s to PDF-s that had #page=xxx fragment ID-s attached to them. Those are not legal fragment ID-s and, actually, the server did not react on them either...
>
> - Unfortunately, http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime or http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer do not dereference, and therefore having them in a <a> element leads to complaints. I looked up in the RDF1.1 document and it uses http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#dateTime (or #integer), so I changed it to those.
>
> - There were some invalid markups (<ul> instead of </ul>, that sort of things). I made those changes.
>
> I have pushed back everything to the repo.
>
> Let us handle these things together next time, now that the publication process is a bit more clean[1]; the various checkers can be run by everyone [2,3,4].
>
> HOWEVER, the major, and blocking issue is as follows. There are three references to PLOS One screen dumps: plosone-json-search-results.png, plosone-xml-search-results.png, and plosone-csv-search-results.png, which are missing from the repository. Can someone put those up, please, so that I could close the loop with the webmaster?
>
> Thanks
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-csv-wg/2014Mar/0149.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules
> [3] http://validator.w3.org/checklink
> [4] http://validator.w3.org/
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Saturday, 22 March 2014 03:48:49 UTC