On 21 Mar 2014 19:00, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I had to make some minor changes on the document to pass pubrules, like: > > I had to do some changes in the documents to make them conformant. > > - There were a number of URI-s to PDF-s that had #page=xxx fragment ID-s attached to them. Those are not legal fragment ID-s and, actually, the server did not react on them either... But fragments aren't sent to the server; they are interpreted client side. Dan > - Unfortunately, http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime or http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer do not dereference, and therefore having them in a <a> element leads to complaints. I looked up in the RDF1.1 document and it uses http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#dateTime (or #integer), so I changed it to those. > > - There were some invalid markups (<ul> instead of </ul>, that sort of things). I made those changes. > > I have pushed back everything to the repo. > > Let us handle these things together next time, now that the publication process is a bit more clean[1]; the various checkers can be run by everyone [2,3,4]. > > HOWEVER, the major, and blocking issue is as follows. There are three references to PLOS One screen dumps: plosone-json-search-results.png, plosone-xml-search-results.png, and plosone-csv-search-results.png, which are missing from the repository. Can someone put those up, please, so that I could close the loop with the webmaster? > > Thanks > > Ivan > > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-csv-wg/2014Mar/0149.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules > [3] http://validator.w3.org/checklink > [4] http://validator.w3.org/ > > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > GPG: 0x343F1A3D > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf > > > > >
Received on Friday, 21 March 2014 20:46:53 UTC