- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:28:30 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Cc: "public-csv-wg@w3.org" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
On 20 March 2014 10:40, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: > On 19/03/14 23:09, Jeni Tennison wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Now that the first two of our documents are getting published as first >> public working drafts, we are moving on to the next stage of our work, >> namely looking at conversion from tabular data into other formats. >> >> We have a wiki document here: >> >> https://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/wiki/Conversions >> >> that describes in very broad terms what we need to do. >> >> Specifically, we’re looking for volunteers to lead the efforts / edit four >> documents, specifying: >> >> * Conversion of CSV to RDF > > > RDF to RDF had two conversion documents. > > (with no strong advocacy) > With hindsight, was it a good idea? Should we do the same? What do you mean here, re "RDF to RDF"? OWL/RIF rules, SPARQL construct etc.? Dan
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2014 11:28:58 UTC