- From: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 21:59:59 +0000
- To: "'ericphb@gmail.com'" <ericphb@gmail.com>
- CC: "'d.ceolin@vu.nl'" <d.ceolin@vu.nl>, "'public-csv-wg@w3.org'" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2624871D9A05174691BD59F8EFD68AE20787DD65@EXXCMPD1DAG1.cmpd1.metoffice.gov.uk>
Thanks Eric. Jeremy From: Eric [mailto:ericphb@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 04:08 PM GMT Standard Time To: Tandy, Jeremy Cc: Ceolin, D. <d.ceolin@vu.nl>; W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org> Subject: Re: moving the use case document to FPWD Jeremy, Davide, and all, I plan attending our working group telecon this week. Having I will be very busy thru Wednesday afternoon in preparation for a review from project sponsors. I should be available after Wednesday for editor activities. Thanks, Eric Sent from my iPhone On Mar 16, 2014, at 8:50 AM, "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>> wrote: Great. I have now: - Added an additional use case in response to the “Direct Mapping” requirement from David Booth - Renumbered the use cases - Clustered the requirements As far as I am concerned, we have ticked off everything we said we would do ahead of the cutoff on Monday. It turns out that I have to travel @ 9am on Monday (to get flights etc.) so I will not now be able to edit the document tomorrow. Also, as I will be chairing a meeting in the US all of next week: - I won’t be able to dial into the teleconference on Wednesday - I won’t be able to edit the document or update the git repository … so should changes need to be made (e.g. editorial, typo fixing etc.), I hope that Eric and Davide can do them I think the Use Case document<http://w3c.github.io/csvw/use-cases-and-requirements/> is fit for publication as FPWD. I don’t anticipate the need for material changes ahead of FPWD publication. BR, Jeremy From: Ceolin, D. [mailto:d.ceolin@vu.nl] Sent: 15 March 2014 14:27 To: Eric Stephan; Tandy, Jeremy Cc: W3C CSV on the Web Working Group Subject: Re: moving the use case document to FPWD Jeremy, Eric, all, I have added use case #21, "Displaying Locations of Care Homes on a Map", http://w3c.github.io/csvw/use-cases-and-requirements/#UC-DisplayingLocationsOfCareHomesOnAMap If I understood it correctly, it requires CSV to JSON transformation, so I have added it as a requirement. I've also checked and fixed a couple of typos in the other use cases mentioned yesterday, that now *should* be ok. Cheers, Davide Il giorno 14/mar/2014, alle ore 22.57, Davide Ceolin ha scritto: Jeremy and Eric, I think I have incorporated all the comments in UC#20 (Representing Entities Extracted from Text) and UC#22 (Intelligently Previewing CSV Files), and that should complete the amendments (comments welcome!). Tomorrow morning I'll give a last check and add UC#21 (Displaying locations of care homes on a map). Cheers, Davide Il giorno 14/mar/2014, alle ore 20.10, Eric Stephan ha scritto: Jeremy and Davide, I completed and checked in the Palo Alto data use case I *think* that completes everything that I promised. I'll be on-line over the weekend if anything comes up. I might attempt adding the table we discussed yesterday. Cheers, Eric On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com<mailto:ericphb@gmail.com>> wrote: Jeremy and Davide, My responses are below using a >> and capital letters. By use of the capital letters I'm not shouting just helping making answers more visible. :-) Thanks, Eric 1) [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data YES 2) [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map POSSIBLY ADDED TO DAVIDE'S LIST? 4) [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use cases #7, #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement in #7 YES Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible? YES Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take action #2 (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map). Please refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use case (not much to say - but could be helpful). On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>> wrote: Hi - in today's teleconf we agreed a number of things to complete for Monday. 1) [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data 2) [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map 3) [Davide] complete amendments to use cases about "intelligent preview" and "representing entities and facts" - see emails here and here. 4) [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use cases #7, #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement in #7 5) [Jeremy] renumber use cases into sequential order 6) [Jeremy] cluster requirements as proposed by JeniT We agreed that there were not, at this time, latent requirements from CSV-LD or CSV2RDF discussion threads. Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump (netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible? Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take action #2 (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map). Please refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use case (not much to say - but could be helpful). I'll do actions #5 and #6 on Monday morning based on the structure of the document I see at that point in time - so expect the use case numbers to have changed by Monday lunch time! Please let me know if I've got any of this wrong J BR, Jeremy --- Davide Ceolin MSc. Postdoctoral Researcher The Network Institute VU University Amsterdam d.ceolin@vu.nl<mailto:d.ceolin@vu.nl> http://www.few.vu.nl/~dceolin/
Received on Sunday, 16 March 2014 22:00:36 UTC