Re: moving the use case document to FPWD

Thanks Eric. Jeremy

From: Eric [mailto:ericphb@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 04:08 PM GMT Standard Time
To: Tandy, Jeremy
Cc: Ceolin, D. <d.ceolin@vu.nl>; W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: moving the use case document to FPWD

Jeremy, Davide, and all,

I plan attending our working group telecon this week. Having I will be very busy thru Wednesday afternoon in preparation for a review from project sponsors.

I should be available after Wednesday for editor activities.

Thanks,

Eric

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 16, 2014, at 8:50 AM, "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>> wrote:

Great. I have now:


-          Added an additional use case in response to the “Direct Mapping” requirement from David Booth

-          Renumbered the use cases

-          Clustered the requirements

As far as I am concerned, we have ticked off everything we said we would do ahead of the cutoff on Monday.

It turns out that I have to travel @ 9am on Monday (to get flights etc.) so I will not now be able to edit the document tomorrow.

Also, as I will be chairing a meeting in the US all of next week:

-          I won’t be able to dial into the teleconference on Wednesday

-          I won’t be able to edit the document or update the git repository … so should changes need to be made (e.g. editorial, typo fixing etc.), I hope that Eric and Davide can do them

I think the Use Case document<http://w3c.github.io/csvw/use-cases-and-requirements/> is fit for publication as FPWD. I don’t anticipate the need for material changes ahead of FPWD publication.

BR, Jeremy

From: Ceolin, D. [mailto:d.ceolin@vu.nl]
Sent: 15 March 2014 14:27
To: Eric Stephan; Tandy, Jeremy
Cc: W3C CSV on the Web Working Group
Subject: Re: moving the use case document to FPWD

Jeremy, Eric, all,

I have added use case #21, "Displaying Locations of Care Homes on a Map",  http://w3c.github.io/csvw/use-cases-and-requirements/#UC-DisplayingLocationsOfCareHomesOnAMap

If I understood it correctly, it requires CSV to JSON transformation, so I have added it as a requirement.
I've also checked and fixed a couple of typos in the other use cases mentioned yesterday, that now *should* be ok.
Cheers,

Davide

Il giorno 14/mar/2014, alle ore 22.57, Davide Ceolin ha scritto:


Jeremy and Eric,

I think I have incorporated all the comments in UC#20 (Representing Entities Extracted from Text) and UC#22 (Intelligently Previewing CSV Files), and that should complete the amendments (comments welcome!).
Tomorrow morning I'll give a last check and add UC#21 (Displaying locations of care homes on a map).
Cheers,

Davide


Il giorno 14/mar/2014, alle ore 20.10, Eric Stephan ha scritto:


Jeremy and Davide,

I completed and checked in the Palo Alto data use case I *think* that
completes everything that I promised.    I'll be on-line over the
weekend if anything comes up.  I might attempt adding the table we
discussed yesterday.

Cheers,

Eric

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com<mailto:ericphb@gmail.com>> wrote:

Jeremy and Davide,

My responses are below using a >> and capital letters.  By use of the
capital letters I'm not shouting just helping making answers more
visible.  :-)

Thanks,

Eric


1)      [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data

YES

2)      [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map

POSSIBLY ADDED TO DAVIDE'S LIST?


4)      [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use
cases #7, #12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement
in #7

YES


Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump
(netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible?

YES

Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take
action #2 (adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a
map). Please refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use
case (not much to say - but could be helpful).



On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Tandy, Jeremy
<jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>> wrote:
Hi - in today's teleconf we agreed a number of things to complete for
Monday.



1)      [Eric] add use case #16 City of Palo Alto tree data

2)      [Eric] add use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map

3)      [Davide] complete amendments to use cases about "intelligent
preview" and "representing entities and facts" - see emails here and here.

4)      [Eric] tease out and make explicit the requirements in use cases #7,
#12 and #17 ... noting the implied "microsyntax" requirement in #7

5)      [Jeremy] renumber use cases into sequential order

6)      [Jeremy] cluster requirements as proposed by JeniT



We agreed that there were not, at this time, latent requirements from CSV-LD
or CSV2RDF discussion threads.



Also, Eric: we previously talked about adding a use case about ncdump
(netcdf dump). Is this still necessary / feasible?



Davide: it seems Eric has a lot still to do ... are you able to take action #2
(adding use case #21 Displaying locations of care homes on a map). Please
refer to my earlier email for my thoughts on that use case (not much to say
- but could be helpful).



I'll do actions #5 and #6 on Monday morning based on the structure of the
document I see at that point in time - so expect the use case numbers to
have changed by Monday lunch time!



Please let me know if I've got any of this wrong J



BR, Jeremy


---
Davide Ceolin MSc.
Postdoctoral Researcher
The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam
d.ceolin@vu.nl<mailto:d.ceolin@vu.nl>
http://www.few.vu.nl/~dceolin/