- From: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:28:17 +0000
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, "public-csv-wg@w3.org" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
Hi - sorry David. We editors of the use case document have been working off the list on the csvw wiki <https://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/wiki/Use_Cases>. I'd forgotten about this one submitted via the list. I will review in detail tomorrow with an aspiration to include asap (or show how it overlaps). Best regards, Jeremy -----Original Message----- From: David Booth [mailto:david@dbooth.org] Sent: 13 March 2014 19:22 To: public-csv-wg@w3.org Subject: CSV+ Direct Mapping use case I notice that the working group is looking to publish the FPWD of the use cases document, http://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/wiki/Use_Cases but AFAICT it does not include the CSV+ Direct Mapping use case that I submitted at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-csv-wg-comments/2014Feb/0007.html and further explained in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-csv-wg/2014Mar/0013.html Has the CSV+ Direct Mapping use case been adequately covered by others? If so, which one(s)? There is no need to include it if other use cases already cover the same need, but I want to be sure that it is covered *somewhere*. Thanks! David
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2014 19:28:45 UTC