- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:40:13 -0800
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: "public-csv-wg@w3.org" <public-csv-wg@w3.org>
On 5 March 2014 06:24, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was asked during the call today about having some discussion on converting CSV to RDF on a call soon. > > Dan and I have discussed this, and we want to focus on getting FPWDs (First Public Working Drafts) of our use cases and syntax documents out the door before we move on to specific discussion about converting tabular data into RDF, JSON, XML or other kinds of formats. > > We will not be scheduling telcon time for CSV-to-RDF conversations until those documents reach FPWD. More attention on and help with those documents will help progress that sooner. But we will get to it, we promise. (Remember we’re only 6 weeks in to the Working Group!) Yes - what Jeni said. Even those of us who generally take it as self-evident that RDF is a good thing, owe it to ourselves to document in a bit more detail _why_ we're so keen on mapping into triples. (In other words I don't consider "Dan wants his CSV converted to RDF" as a use case :) Dan > Thanks, > > Jeni > -- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com/ >
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2014 14:40:40 UTC