Re: CSVW use case authors: please review your use cases!

Stasinos,

I agree.  You make an interesting point, from the NetCDF data file
perspective this is certainly true, carrying this requirement forward
in CDL would provide this kind of capability in the tabular form.

Thank you,

Eric

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Stasinos Konstantopoulos
<konstant@iit.demokritos.gr> wrote:
> Dear Eric, all,
>
> Shouldn't the NetCDF/CDL use case [1] also require R-RandomAccess [2]?
> The variables given as "dimensions" in the header can be used to
> directly access slices of the overall data cube.
>
> Best,
> s
>
> [1] http://w3c.github.io/csvw/use-cases-and-requirements/index.html#UC-NetCdFcDl
> [2] http://w3c.github.io/csvw/use-cases-and-requirements/index.html#deferred-req
>
>
> On 6 June 2014 18:49, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> CSVW Use Case authors,
>>
>> Please take a few minutes to provide a review of your edited use case.
>>
>> Please read carefully and update the wiki as soon as possible.
>> https://www.w3.org/2013/csvw/wiki/Use_Cases_Check for your particular
>> use case.
>>
>> As part of the review process we wanted to make sure you had a chance
>> to review the use case and provide feedback to the CSVW Use Case
>> Editorial Team. Below is a reference table to all the use cases in our
>> Github use case document.
>>
>> Please:
>>
>> Make sure the use case is articulated correctly
>> Review the list of requirements
>> Check on the examples and any links
>> Document the contributors along with 3rd party proxy contributors
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Eric
>>

Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2014 12:32:48 UTC