- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 13:02:11 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <EF2FA64D-61F6-4C22-BE6D-C22F41C108D3@w3.org>
Gregg,
I have installed the files under
http://www.w3.org/ns/csvw.*
I used the 'base' as the respec document type; although that adds some lines to the status section that we should probably remove for the final version.
I have also changed the 'alternate format' URI-s to csvw.{ttl,jsonld}, because that is how it works in the /ns directory. It may be a good idea to change that on the repository, too, but that probably depends on the way you generate those files, so I did not want to touch that. I have pushed the small changes of the index.html file to the repo.
Thanks!
Ivan
> On 21 Dec 2014, at 01:39 , Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>
> Okay, now uses ReSpec and indicates status.
>
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>
>> On Dec 20, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 20 December 2014 at 08:44, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>> I haven't reviewed all the details, but I am happy to install these if we all give a thumb up (you have mine). Even if the content is not final, hey, these are still drafts.
>>
>> It looks good to me in terms of the basic structure / approach. It
>> needs a 'Status of This Document' warning that it is a
>> work-in-progress and in support of [list of docs] produced by the CSVW
>> WG [link]. We should also flag the possibility that it may not be
>> perfectly in sync with the latest Working Drafts from the WG, or for
>> that matter that the WDs might not all be 100% mutually consistent
>> (and on that point, I can't comment on the detail of how well it does
>> match materials from the WDs...)
>>
>> Apart from that it looks good to go.
>>
>> Thanks for putting this together, Gregg!
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>>> On 19 Dec 2014, at 20:26 , Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I created an HTML+RDFa version of the CSVW vocabulary [1], built from the JSON-LD context document [2]. Note that the context was updated to use reverse properties to reference rdfs_classes, rdfs_properties, rdfs_datatypes, and rdfs_instances, making the body of the context a single object, rather than an array referenced by @graph.
>>>>
>>>> The HTML includes RDFa equivalent to both the JSON-LD and Turtle [3] versions which are also referenced from the document as "alternate" references.
>>>>
>>>> With group consensus, I believe that [1] can be placed at http://www.w3.org/ns/csvw/index.html along with context.jsonld and vocab.ttl, which should be served from http://www.w3.org/ns/csvw via appropriate content negotiation.
>>>>
>>>> Gregg Kellogg
>>>> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://w3c.github.io/csvw/ns/
>>>> [2] http://w3c.github.io/csvw/ns/context.jsonls
>>>> [2] http://w3c.github.io/csvw/ns/vocab.ttl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Sunday, 21 December 2014 12:02:22 UTC