- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 13:02:11 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <EF2FA64D-61F6-4C22-BE6D-C22F41C108D3@w3.org>
Gregg, I have installed the files under http://www.w3.org/ns/csvw.* I used the 'base' as the respec document type; although that adds some lines to the status section that we should probably remove for the final version. I have also changed the 'alternate format' URI-s to csvw.{ttl,jsonld}, because that is how it works in the /ns directory. It may be a good idea to change that on the repository, too, but that probably depends on the way you generate those files, so I did not want to touch that. I have pushed the small changes of the index.html file to the repo. Thanks! Ivan > On 21 Dec 2014, at 01:39 , Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > > Okay, now uses ReSpec and indicates status. > > Gregg Kellogg > gregg@greggkellogg.net > >> On Dec 20, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >> >> On 20 December 2014 at 08:44, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >>> I haven't reviewed all the details, but I am happy to install these if we all give a thumb up (you have mine). Even if the content is not final, hey, these are still drafts. >> >> It looks good to me in terms of the basic structure / approach. It >> needs a 'Status of This Document' warning that it is a >> work-in-progress and in support of [list of docs] produced by the CSVW >> WG [link]. We should also flag the possibility that it may not be >> perfectly in sync with the latest Working Drafts from the WG, or for >> that matter that the WDs might not all be 100% mutually consistent >> (and on that point, I can't comment on the detail of how well it does >> match materials from the WDs...) >> >> Apart from that it looks good to go. >> >> Thanks for putting this together, Gregg! >> >> Dan >> >>> Ivan >>> >>>> On 19 Dec 2014, at 20:26 , Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> I created an HTML+RDFa version of the CSVW vocabulary [1], built from the JSON-LD context document [2]. Note that the context was updated to use reverse properties to reference rdfs_classes, rdfs_properties, rdfs_datatypes, and rdfs_instances, making the body of the context a single object, rather than an array referenced by @graph. >>>> >>>> The HTML includes RDFa equivalent to both the JSON-LD and Turtle [3] versions which are also referenced from the document as "alternate" references. >>>> >>>> With group consensus, I believe that [1] can be placed at http://www.w3.org/ns/csvw/index.html along with context.jsonld and vocab.ttl, which should be served from http://www.w3.org/ns/csvw via appropriate content negotiation. >>>> >>>> Gregg Kellogg >>>> gregg@greggkellogg.net >>>> >>>> [1] http://w3c.github.io/csvw/ns/ >>>> [2] http://w3c.github.io/csvw/ns/context.jsonls >>>> [2] http://w3c.github.io/csvw/ns/vocab.ttl >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ---- >>> Ivan Herman, W3C >>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead >>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 >>> >>> >>> >>> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Sunday, 21 December 2014 12:02:22 UTC