Re: Proposed changes for RFC 4180

On 08/04/14 03:59, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2014, at 7:34 PM, Yakov Shafranovich <yakov-ietf@shaftek.org> wrote:
...

>> 4. Allow escaping via backslashes in addition to "". Obvious question
>> is how to distinguish between which method is being used.

Is that an "as well as" or an "alternative" - i.e. can be be mixed?

Is this

"abc""def\"ghi"

a way to write

abc"def"ghi

?

Does it include the usual suspects \n \r etc?

That would be good for avoiding raw newline issues and also line-by-line 
processing.

	Andy

>
> Gregg
>
>> Thanks,
>> Yakov
>>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2014 09:36:05 UTC