- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:51:54 -0700
- To: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-csv-wg-comments@w3.org
> [snip] > pattern: > Could you write "und" instead of und (unquoted)? For those of us > reading the document with a Screen Reader or similar tool (actually a > plain text serializer in my case), the monospace formatting is lost. monospace formatting is used in a number of places, and double-quoting this one in particular doesn’t seem consistent; you’d need to double-quote many other cases as well, which would be a substantial stylistic change. Could this be solved with a CSS style for an appropriate @media selector? Are there some uses of <code> you think should be handled different than others? Can we do this through CSS? >> [snip] > > Offhand, figure 1 [3] was generated at a resolution which is too small > to read at 100%; text runs together... Also, the gray background is > unhelpful. This is pretty standard ReSpec formatting for examples. Could this be addressed using a media-specific style? > [snip] >> A boolean atomic property taking a single value > > isn't `taking a single value` redundant for `boolean`? Consistent with wording for other properties wins, IMO. > [snip] >> This property is irrelevant if the separator is null or undefined, but this is not an error. > > `but this is not an error` doesn't make sense / read well Scans okay to me; do you have a specific suggested wording that would improve it? I took care of the rest of the comments from this email in a pull request [1]. I’ll leave comments on the conversion documents to one of the editors of those documents. Thanks for such great attention to detail. Gregg [1] https://github.com/w3c/csvw/pull/690
Received on Friday, 17 July 2015 23:52:26 UTC