- From: Guillaume Ayoub <guillaume@yabz.fr>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 09:54:13 +0200
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: public-cssprint@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2023 07:54:28 UTC
Hi, WeasyPrint, for example, does not synthesize oblique and bold fonts. There’s no real technical limitation to add the feature (WeasyPrint use libraries that can do that), but it’s never been necessary so far: users are generally happy when they’re explained that they should use real italic / bold fonts instead to get better result. -- Guillaume Le jeu. 21 sept. 2023 à 16:39:13 +09:00:00, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> a écrit : > Hi, > > The css-fonts-4 spec (and predecessors) assumes that synthesizing > oblique font faces when lacking a real oblique (or italic) font is > something that some but not all engines do. There is a control to > turn it off when the author so desires (font-synthesis-style: none), > but even if that has not been applied, the rest of the font selection > logic assumes that there might be engines that don't support > synthesis. > > This is not the case for browsers. They all do support synthesis of > oblique faces. How about css print engines? Is there any that lack > the ability to synthesize oblique fonts? > > —Florian
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2023 07:54:28 UTC