Saturday, 26 February 2011
- [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-valid-characters-001: questions
- [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-rule-003: pass conditions, invalid flag and assert text
- [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-rule-002: pass conditions, line-height and assert text
- RE: [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht
Friday, 25 February 2011
- Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-024 : its reftest and text assertion
- Re: [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht
- Re: [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht
- Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-024 : its reftest and text assertion
- Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-name-024 : its reftest and text assertion
- Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-024 : its reftest and text assertion
- [RC5, pre-RC6] white-space-collapsing-001 (unexpected horizontal scrollbar)
- [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-024 : its reftest and text assertion
- Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] font-family-024 : its reftest and text assertion
Wednesday, 23 February 2011
- [CSS3]text-decoration-line-underline-001.xht
- [CSS3]text-decoration-line-overline-001.xht
- [CSS3]text-decoration-line-line-through-001.xht
- [CSS3]text-decoration-line-none-001.xht
Tuesday, 22 February 2011
Monday, 21 February 2011
- Fixed Re: [RC5, pre-RC6] link-visited-selector-001 questionable under 2 RFCs
- [RC5, pre-RC6] list-style-position-applies-to-* testcases: inheritance of list-style-position versus applicability
- [RC5, pre-RC6] link-visited-selector-001 questionable under 2 RFCs
- [RC5, pre-RC6] first-line-pseudo-017 and 018: "line should be green"
- [RC5, pre-RC6] first-line-pseudo-011 improvements
- [RC5, pre-RC6] first-letter-selector-015 inaccurate pass conditions
- [RC5, pre-RC6] dom-hover-001 and dom-hover-002
- [RC5, pre-RC6] floats-110 and "floats wrap in one or two columns"
- [CSS3]text-emphasis-color-001.xht
Sunday, 20 February 2011
- RE: [RC4] margin-left-001 invalid
- Test case for the \* type selector (CSS3 selectors)
- [RC5] first-letter-quote-003|4|5|6.htm and their correspondent reftest
Thursday, 17 February 2011
- RE: [RC5] separated-border-model-003 is not testing its assert goals
- RE: [RC5] caption-side-applies-to-003: more accurate pass conditions
- RE: [RC5] fixed-table-layout-007 has issues
- RE: [RC5] border-spacing-applies-to-015 contradicts table-caption-002
- RE: [RC5] content-computed-value-002 and content-computed-value-003 identical
- RE: [RC5] top-offset-001's assert and top-offset-003 wrt containing block
Wednesday, 16 February 2011
- Re: [CSS3]text-transform-lowercase-001.xht
- Re: [CSS3]text-transform-uppercase-001.xht
- Re: [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht
- Re: [CSS3]white-space-collapsing-discard-001.xht
- Re: [RC5] linking to ref-test of html4/first-letter-001.htm ; bigger first-letter
- [CSS3]white-space-collapsing-preserve-breaks-001.xht
- RE: [CSS3]text-transform-uppercase-001.xht
- [CSS3]white-space-collapsing-discard-001.xht
- Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht
- RE: [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht
- [CSS3]text-indent-percentage-001.xht
Tuesday, 15 February 2011
- Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht
- [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-lr-002.xht
- Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl-001.xht?(B
- [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl-001.xht
- [CSS3]text-transform-uppercase-001.xht
- [CSS3]text-transform-none-001.xht
- [CSS3]text-transform-lowercase-001.xht
Monday, 14 February 2011
- Question about at-page-rule-001
- [CSS3]text-transform-capitalize-001.xht
- Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht
- [CSS3]text-transform-fullwidth-001.xht
Saturday, 12 February 2011
- [RC5] linking to ref-test of html4/first-letter-001.htm ; bigger first-letter
- Re: [RC5]: page-break-inside-006 misses flags (paged)
Friday, 11 February 2011
Thursday, 10 February 2011
- Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht
- Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht
- Re: [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht�
- Re: [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht?(B
- Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht
- RE: [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht?(B
- Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht
Wednesday, 9 February 2011
- [RC5] top-offset-001's assert and top-offset-003 wrt containing block
- Border-spacing implementation in an HTML table with at least 2 table-row-groups elements
- [RC5] issues or improvements for c71-fwd-parsing-004 , c566-list-stl-001 , c565-list-pos-000 , c5525-fltcont-000
- [RC5] caption-side-applies-to-003: more accurate pass conditions
- [RC5] content-computed-value-002 and content-computed-value-003 identical
- [RC5] separated-border-model-003 is not testing its assert goals
- [RC5] border-spacing-applies-to-015 contradicts table-caption-002
- [RC5] fixed-table-layout-007 has issues
- [RC5] c5524-height-002
- [RC5] c548-ln-ht-002 invalid; invalid flag missing
- [RC5] c547-indent-000 invalid
- [RC5] c43-center-000 invalid; c5525-fltwidth-002 too
- [RC5] c542-letter-sp-000 invalid
- [RC5] c541-word-sp-000 invalid
- [RC5] c526-font-sz-002 invalid
- [RC5] c43-rpl-bbx-002 invalid (need corrections) ; c43-rpl-ibx-000 invalid (need corrections)
- RE: [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht
- Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht
- Re: [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht
- Re: [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht
- [CSS3]writing-mode-vertical-rl.xht
- [CSS3]text-transform-kana-001.xht
Tuesday, 8 February 2011
- Re: submission of CSS3 testcases by east-tokyo [CSS Test: text-transform - large-kana - basic cases]
- Re: submission of CSS3 testcases by east-tokyo [CSS Test: text-transform - large-kana - basic cases]
Monday, 7 February 2011
Sunday, 6 February 2011
Saturday, 5 February 2011
Friday, 4 February 2011
- Re: submission of CSS3 testcases by east-tokyo
- submission of CSS3 testcases by east-tokyo
- Re: [RC4] floats-108, floats-109, floats-110, floats-126 to 131: "floats wrap in one or two columns"
- Re: [RC4] letter-spacing-102: incorrect fail condition
- Re: bidi tests assume undefined letter-spacing behavior
Thursday, 3 February 2011
- Tests on interaction with JavaScript needed: cascade, specificity and similia
- Moved all run-in test cases
- Re: abspos-010 result unclear.
- abspos-010 result unclear.
Wednesday, 2 February 2011
- RE: [RC3] font-family-rule-017 (was RE: review of Microsoft CSS 2.1 font tests)
- RE: Proposed replacements for column-visibility-003 and row-visibility-003 (addition of column-visibility-004)
- Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid
- Re: split of dynamic-top-change-005
- Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid
- Re: Wording of text-transform-bicameral-*
- Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid
- Re: split of dynamic-top-change-005