Sunday, 31 October 2010
Friday, 29 October 2010
- [RC3] table-layout-003 is not testing what it was supposed to be testing
- content-counter-010 invalid (7000 in Armenian)
- Re: RC3 online in the test harness
Thursday, 28 October 2010
- Re: RC3 online in the test harness
- Re: Corrections to the Implemention Reports
- RC3 online in the test harness
- Re: Corrections to the Implemention Reports
- [css3-fonts]
- Re: Corrections to the Implemention Reports
- Re: Corrections to the Implemention Reports
- Re: Corrections to the Implemention Reports
- Re: Corrections to the Implemention Reports
- [CSS21] column-visibility-003 - visibility:collapse and colspan
- Re: Corrections to the Implemention Reports
- [RC3] Release Notes for CSS2.1 Test Suite RC3
- Re: Corrections to the Implemention Reports
- [RC3] table-height-algorithm-005 is invalid
- [RC3] background-position-202 invalid; comma not a valid separator in CSS 2.1
Wednesday, 27 October 2010
- Re: Implementation Report location
- Re: Corrections to the Implemention Reports
- RC3 font-size-091
- Implementation Report location
- RC3 table-height-algorithm-027
- Re: CSS2.1 RC3 Published
- Re: CSS2.1 RC3 Published
- Corrections to the Implemention Reports
- RE: Internet Explorer Implementation Report
- CSS2.1 RC3 Published
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: path to the fonts.zip file is broken
- Re: path to the fonts.zip file is broken
- RE: Internet Explorer Implementation Report
- path to the fonts.zip file is broken
- Re: Internet Explorer Implementation Report
Tuesday, 26 October 2010
- RE: Internet Explorer Implementation Report
- Re: [RC2] tables-101 and snowflake overlapping/overflowing cell border
- Re: Internet Explorer Implementation Report
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- Internet Explorer Implementation Report
Monday, 25 October 2010
- Re: build error in boolean attributes
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- RE: content-072.htm is invalid
- RE: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- RE: content-072.htm is invalid
- build error in boolean attributes
- RE: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- RE: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- RE: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- RE: content-072.htm is invalid
- RE: content-072.htm is invalid
Sunday, 24 October 2010
- Re: page-break-margins-000 unfinished
- Re: page-break-before-008 looks invalid
- Re: page-break-before-004 looks invalid
- Re: page-container-008 invalid
- Re: page-break-inside-006 invalid
- Re: page-break-inside-004 invalid
- Re: background-root-018's readibility style doesn't work in XHTML version
- Re: background-root-018's readibility style doesn't work in XHTML version
Saturday, 23 October 2010
- Re: background-root-018's readibility style doesn't work in XHTML version
- Re: [RC2] separated-borders-model-007
- Re: word-spacing-001 invalid
- Re: vertical-align-115/116 invalid
- Re: table-valign-002 invalid
- Re: table-valign-001 is invalid
- Re: quotes-036 possibly invalid
- Re: border-collapse-inherited-001 makes invalid assumptions about UA style sheet
- Re: html-precedence-003 (was Re: Chrome 6 test results for user stylesheets tests)
- [CSS21] groove vs. outset with border-collapse / border-conflict-style-XXX tests
- Re: background-bg-pos-205 has incorrect pass condition
- Re: margin-collapse-160 has unclear pass condition
- Re: background-root-018's readibility style doesn't work in XHTML version
- Re: [RC2] separated-borders-model-007
- Re: user-stylesheet-015 invalid because it assumes other rules not present at user level
- Re: [RC2] tables-101 and snowflake overlapping/overflowing cell border
Friday, 22 October 2010
- [RC2] absolute-non-replaced-height-001 and Safari IR
- Updates of gtalbot testcases
- [RC2] tables-101 and snowflake overlapping/overflowing cell border
- font-family-name tests
Thursday, 21 October 2010
Wednesday, 20 October 2010
- Re: [CSSWG] CSS2.1 Editor's Draft
- Re: [CSSWG] CSS2.1 Editor's Draft
- [CSSWG] CSS2.1 Editor's Draft
- Re: floats-137 invalid
- Re: floats-137 invalid
- Re: floats-137 invalid
- Re: floats-137 invalid
Tuesday, 19 October 2010
- Re: floats-137 invalid
- user-stylesheet-015 invalid because it assumes other rules not present at user level
- Re: background-root-018's readibility style doesn't work in XHTML version
- table-layout:auto e.g. border-width-applies-to-00*
- Re: [RC2] separated-borders-model-007
- Re: table-anonymous-objects-079/080/085/086 require too wide a window
- Re: table-anonymous-objects-033/034 were mis-imported from reftests
- Re: table-anonymous-objects-045/046/047/048/049/050 should be marked nonHTML
- absolute-non-replaced-width-008, absolute-non-replaced-width-009 and background-intrinsic-001
- Firefox 4.0b6 (Linux) implementation report for CSS 2.1
Monday, 18 October 2010
- tests testing min/max-height on internal table elements invalid
- replaced-element-intrinsic-ratio-002 probably invalid
- replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001 probably invalid
- Re: z-index-abspos-009 invalid
- Re: [RC2] separated-borders-model-007
- replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001 broken
- direction-unicode-bidi-028 probably invalid
- floats-137 invalid
- overflow-003/004/005 have incorrect pass condition / dependence on font metrics
- user-stylesheet-012 invalid
- text-transform-bicameral-004 probably invalid
- Re: background-bg-pos-205 has incorrect pass condition
- margin-collapse-160 has unclear pass condition
- left-007/008 should not require scrolling
- Re: focus-pseudo-class-001/002 use unusual term "text zone"
- Re: font-family-rule-002 invalid
- Re: font-family-rule-002 invalid
- font-family-rule-002 invalid
- focus-pseudo-class-001/002 use unusual term "text zone"
- floats-137 doesn't work in XHTML format
- Re: (user stylesheet testing) Re: Fwd: Chrome HTML4 implementation report (nearly) finished
- RE: (user stylesheet testing) Re: Fwd: Chrome HTML4 implementation report (nearly) finished
- Re: (user stylesheet testing) Re: Fwd: Chrome HTML4 implementation report (nearly) finished
- cursor-007/008/009/010/011/012/013/014 pass conditions incorrect
- Re: Fwd: Chrome HTML4 implementation report (nearly) finished
- Re: Miscellaneous invalid tests
- Re: html-precedence-003 (was Re: Chrome 6 test results for user stylesheets tests)
- Re: first-letter-punctuation-011/261/358 invalid
- Re: border-collapse-inherited-001 makes invalid assumptions about UA style sheet
- Re: [RC2] separated-borders-model-007
- Re: font-family-name-016 invalid due to numbers in unquoted font-family names
- background-root-018's readibility style doesn't work in XHTML version
- background-bg-pos-205 has incorrect pass condition
- background-321/322/323/324/325 have incorrect pass condition
- page-break-margins-001 should say "may" rather than "must"
- page-break-margins-000 unfinished
- page-break-before-008 looks invalid
- page-break-before-004 looks invalid
- allowed-page-breaks-001a looks invalid
- page-container-008 invalid
- page-break-inside-006 invalid
- page-break-inside-004 invalid
Sunday, 17 October 2010
- z-index-abspos-009 invalid
- word-spacing-001 invalid
- vertical-align-115/116 invalid
- text-transform-bicameral-008 probably invalid
- text-decoration-visibility-011/012 only work at wide window widths
- Re: table-anonymous-objects-033/034 were mis-imported from reftests
Saturday, 16 October 2010
- text-align-white-space-002/006 invalid
- table-valign-002 invalid
- table-valign-001 is invalid
- Re: Opera HTML4/nonHTML Implementation Report
- table-height-algorithm-026 invalid
- table-anonymous-objects-079/080/085/086 require too wide a window
- table-anonymous-objects-033/034 were mis-imported from reftests
- table-anonymous-objects-045/046/047/048/049/050 should be marked nonHTML
- Re: outline-width-095/096 invalid
- table-anonymous-block-011 assumes 'line-height' 'normal' == '1.0'
- Re: outline-width-095/096 invalid
- shape-spaces-001 makes invalid assumptions about font metrics
- rtl-borders-001 invalid
- quotes-036 possibly invalid
- position-relative-033 makes incorrect assumptions about font metrics
- position-fixed-006 is invalid in XHTML
- various overflow-applies-to-* tests have incorrect pass conditions
- outline-width-095/096 invalid
- Re: margin-collapse-108 makes invalid assumptions about rounding
- incorrect pass condition on outline-*-applies-to-010
- incorrect pass condition on outline-017
- Re: font-family-rule-005 pass condition is incorrect
- Re: first-letter-non-punctuation-001 invalid
- Re: incorrect pass conditions for c534-bgreps-000/001/002/003/004/005
- border-collapse-applies-to-001/005/008/010/011/014 and their pass conditions ("below" vs "to the side of")
- html-precedence-003 (was Re: Chrome 6 test results for user stylesheets tests)
- Chrome 6 test results for user stylesheets testcases of CSS 2.1 test suite
- (user stylesheet testing) Re: Fwd: Chrome HTML4 implementation report (nearly) finished
- Re: block-in-inline-insert-005 should be removed
- Re: Fwd: Chrome HTML4 implementation report (nearly) finished
- Re: Fwd: Chrome HTML4 implementation report (nearly) finished
- Re: block-in-inline-insert-005 should be removed
- Re: background-root-008/009 invalid in XHTML format
- Re: margin-collapse-036 will be invalid when issue-159 is addressed
- Re: list-style-position-018 is invalid
- Re: list-style-position-018 is invalid
- Re: list-style-position-018 is invalid
- Re: margin-right-113 makes invalid assumptions about rounding
- margin-collapse-036 will be invalid when issue-159 is addressed
- margin-collapse-108 makes invalid assumptions about rounding
- margin-right-113 makes invalid assumptions about rounding
- list-style-position-018 is invalid
- line-height-bleed-003 has incorrect pass condition
- line-height-014 is invalid
Friday, 15 October 2010
- line-height-111 has incorrect pass condition
- incorrect pass conditions (and missing 'should' flag) in numerous line-height tests
- inline-formatting-context-020 is invalid
- pass condition for inline-formatting-context-017 incorrect
- inline-formatting-context-015 has incorrect pass condition
- html-attribute-001 invalid
- Re: font-051/052/053/054/055/056 invalid (system font keywords are ok font families)
- Re: font-051/052/053/054/055/056 invalid (system font keywords are ok font families)
- RE: font-051/052/053/054/055/056 invalid (system font keywords are ok font families)
- Re: font-051/052/053/054/055/056 invalid (system font keywords are ok font families)
- small size differences in font-family-name-007/008/013/014/015
- Re: font-051/052/053/054/055/056 invalid (system font keywords are ok font families)
- font-family-name-016 invalid due to numbers in unquoted font-family names
- font-family-name-024 and the CSSTest Fallback font
- Re: font-051/052/053/054/055/056 invalid (system font keywords are ok font families)
- RE: font-051/052/053/054/055/056 invalid (system font keywords are ok font families)
- font-family-rule-005 pass condition is incorrect
- font-051/052/053/054/055/056 invalid (system font keywords are ok font families)
- floats-117/120/122 invalid because they assume line-height 'normal' == '1'
- floats-031 invalid
- first-letter-non-punctuation-001 invalid
- first-letter-punctuation-011/261/358 invalid
- Incorrect @charset tests
- Microsoft's numbers-units-014 and table-height-algorithm-026
- Re: cascade-precedence-001/002/003/004/005/006/007 invalid
- Re: cascade-precedence-001/002/003/004/005/006/007 invalid
- Re: cascade-precedence-001/002/003/004/005/006/007 invalid
- Re: cascade-precedence-001/002/003/004/005/006/007 invalid
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: cascade-precedence-001/002/003/004/005/006/007 invalid
- Re: cascade-precedence-001/002/003/004/005/006/007 invalid
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: content-072.htm is invalid
- Re: cascade-precedence-001/002/003/004/005/006/007 invalid
Thursday, 14 October 2010
- Re: Duplicates in reftest.list
- Re: Duplicates in reftest.list
- Duplicates in reftest.list
- first-letter-punct-before-001 invalid
- empty-cells-applies-to-001 isn't quite a box
- Re: Implementation Report Template for CSS2.1 Test Suite
- incorrect pass conditions for content-white-space-003/004
- content-140 pass condition is incorrect
- content-072.htm is invalid
- content-016 pass condition is too strict
- containing-block-018/020/022 pass condition is backwards
- cascade-precedence-001/002/003/004/005/006/007 invalid
- c566-list-stl-000 is invalid
- pass condition incorrect for c5525-fltwidth-002
- c5504-mrgn-l-002 is invalid
- confusing pass conditions in c543-txt-decor-000
- incorrect pass conditions for c534-bgreps-000/001/002/003/004/005
- Re: incorrect pass condition in c43-rpl-bbx-000/001
- incorrect pass conditions in c525-font-wt-000 (font-weight)
- c43-rpl-ibx-000 assumes line-height 'normal' == '1'
- Re: c43-center-000 assumes line-height 'normal' == '1'
- c43-rpl-bbx-002 assumes line-height 'normal' == '1'
- incorrect pass condition in c43-rpl-bbx-000/001
- Re: incorrect pass condition on border-bottom/top-width-applies-to-010
- Re: border-bottom-width-083/084 assume space in default font is 4px wide
- Re: border-*-width-036/047 (etc.?) make invalid assumptions about rounding
- c43-center-000 assumes line-height 'normal' == '1'
- border-collapse-inherited-001 makes invalid assumptions about UA style sheet
- incorrect pass condition on border-bottom/top-width-applies-to-010
- border-bottom-width-083/084 assume space in default font is 4px wide
- border-*-width-036/047 (etc.?) make invalid assumptions about rounding
- block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid (and was Issue 138 resolution sufficient?)
- block-in-inline-insert-005 should be removed
- Re: absolute-replaced-width-016/017/018 incorrect
- Re: absolute-replaced-width-016/017/018 incorrect
- bidi-breaking-002 probably invalid (items 3 and 4)
- Re: absolute-replaced-width-016/017/018 incorrect
- Re: background-root-004/005/006/007/008/009/010/013 have incorrect pass conditions
- Re: before-content-display-015 invalid
- Re: after-content-display-015 invalid
- Re: abspos-004 has incorrect pass condition ; abspos-003 too
- bidi-009 invalid
- bidi tests assume undefined letter-spacing behavior
- bidi-004 probably invalid
- Re: absolute-replaced-width-016/017/018 incorrect
- before-content-display-015 invalid
- background-root-008/009 invalid in XHTML format
- background-root-004/005/006/007/008/009/010/013 have incorrect pass conditions
- Re: absolute-replaced-width-016/017/018 incorrect
- support/ref-green-box-100x100.htm incorrect
- after-content-display-015 invalid
- active-selector-002 invalid
Wednesday, 13 October 2010
- abspos-004 has incorrect pass condition
- Re: absolute-replaced-width-016/017/018 incorrect
- absolute-replaced-width-016/017/018 incorrect
- implementation report template has lines for tests that don't exist (HTMLonly, nonHTML tests)
- incorrect pass conditions in absolute-replaced-height-013/020/027/034
- link-visited-selector-004 has incorrect pass condition
- bidi-override-003 and bidi-override-004 (was Re: Bidi tests)
- Re: [RC2] separated-borders-model-007
- Bidi tests
- Re: [RC2] separated-borders-model-007
- [RC2] separated-borders-model-007
- Re: floats-137.xht is broken
- floats-137.xht is broken
- counter-reset-sibling-001 text is confusing
Tuesday, 12 October 2010
- Re: 2 slightly incorrect cases : [after|before]-content-display-015 (table-caption shrunk to min content width)
- Re: xhtml1/background-root-008.xht invalid
- xhtml1/background-root-008.xht invalid
- implementation-report-TEMPLATE.data has lines for non-existent tests
- Re: 2 slightly incorrect cases
- 2 slightly incorrect cases
Monday, 11 October 2010
- Microsoft line-height-111.htm (line-height: normal assumed to only be 2 values)
- Microsoft border-conflict-style-074.htm (outset taking precedence over groove)
- Miscellaneous invalid tests
- Re: content-158 and content-159
- Re: content-158 and content-159
- Re: content-158 and content-159
- content-158 and content-159
- table-height-algorithm-027
- CSS2.1 Test Case Authoring Guidelines pages no longer reachable
Saturday, 9 October 2010
- Re: focus-pseudo-class-003 assumes platform behavior
- focus-pseudo-class-003 assumes platform behavior
Friday, 8 October 2010
Thursday, 7 October 2010
- 19 RC2 testcases with insufficient space to display a bullet list-marker or involving display: list-item
- Re: Range for values (Was: Re: invalid tests about range of integer values)
- Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002
- Range for values (Was: Re: invalid tests about range of integer values)
- Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002
- Re: Questions on abspos-paged-001 , abspos-paged-002 and testcases for paged media
- Questions on abspos-paged-001 , abspos-paged-002 and testcases for paged media
Wednesday, 6 October 2010
- text-indent-applies-to-00{1,7}
- c527-font-000
- list-style-position-017
- Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002
- Re: Incorrect assert in absolute-non-replaced-width tests
- Re: More test feedback
- Incorrect assert in absolute-non-replaced-width tests
- Re: content-white-space-004 pass condition is bogus
- More test feedback
- Re: bidi-alt-001 probably invalid
- Status of work on Mozilla implementation report
- Re: bidi-alt-001 probably invalid
Tuesday, 5 October 2010
- bidi-alt-001 probably invalid
- content-white-space-004 pass condition is bogus
- Re: invalid tests about range of integer values
- Re: invalid tests about range of integer values
- Re: invalid tests about range of integer values
- Re: invalid tests about range of integer values
- Re: invalid tests about range of integer values
- Re: Tests that should mention antialiasing effects for "no red"
- Re: invalid tests about range of integer values
- invalid tests about range of integer values
Monday, 4 October 2010
- Tests that should mention antialiasing effects for "no red"
- RE: 15 rejectable XHTML *-replaced-width-* testcases from section 10.3.x
- Re: Opera 10.x, content-type-00x testcases and rendering modes
- Re: Opera 10.x, content-type-00x testcases and rendering modes
- Re: Opera 10.x, content-type-00x testcases and rendering modes
- Opera 10.x, content-type-00x testcases and rendering modes
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: test feedback
- Re: [RC2] table-anonymous-objects-0xx again ; block-in-inline-insert testcases (validation errors)
- RE: 15 rejectable XHTML *-replaced-width-* testcases from section 10.3.x
- Re: More test feedback
- Re: RC2 doesn't match SVN
- RC2 doesn't match SVN
Sunday, 3 October 2010
Monday, 4 October 2010
- Re: More test feedback
- 15 rejectable XHTML *-replaced-width-* testcases from section 10.3.x
- Re: background-position-201 and its outer circle
- [RC2] table-anonymous-objects-0xx again ; block-in-inline-insert testcases (validation errors)
Sunday, 3 October 2010
- Re: 20101001: missing tests (false alarm)
- Re: 20101001: missing tests
- Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite RC2 Release Notes
- [RC2] 13 Testcases with a missing (9 ahem, 4 dom) flag
- background-position-201 and its outer circle
- Re: More test feedback
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: test feedback
- More test feedback
- Re: 20101001: missing tests
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: test feedback
- Re: 20101001: missing tests
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: test feedback
- Re: CSS 2.1 test suite feedback: general test issues
- 20101001: missing tests
- Re: Time for tests with script to settle?
Saturday, 2 October 2010
- Re: reference in testinfo.data
- reference in testinfo.data
- CSS2.1 Test Suite RC2 Release Notes
- Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite RC2 Build Posted