Friday, 31 December 2010
- Re: [RC3] containing-block-017 and containing-block-003 not testing what they are supposed to test
- Re: [RC3] containing-block-017 and containing-block-003 not testing what they are supposed to test
- Re: [RC3] containing-block-017 and containing-block-003 not testing what they are supposed to test
Wednesday, 29 December 2010
- RE: [RC3] containing-block-017 and containing-block-003 not testing what they are supposed to test
- Re: [RC4] active-selector-002
- [RC4] page-container-004 pass conditions are not clear enough
- Re: [RC4] active-selector-002
Tuesday, 28 December 2010
- [RC4] z-index-abspos-009 currently invalid
- Re: [RC4] active-selector-002
- Re: [RC4] active-selector-002
- Re: [RC4] active-selector-002
- Re: [RC4] active-selector-002
- Re: [RC4] active-selector-002
- Re: [RC4] active-selector-002
- [CSS21] margin-collapse-164 is currently invalid per section 9.5.2
- Re: Spelling mistake, attribute "rek" should be "rel"
- Re: [RC4] margin-collpase-108 is currently invalid
- [RC4] margin-collpase-108 is currently invalid
- Spelling mistake, attribute "rek" should be "rel"
Monday, 27 December 2010
- Re: [RC4] c525-font-wt-000.xht
- Re: [RC4] active-selector-002
- Re: [RC4] bidi-alt-001 Re: RC4 Invalid tests
- Re: Tests and http
- Re: first-letter-punct-before-* tests unnecessarily hard to use
Friday, 24 December 2010
Thursday, 23 December 2010
- Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid (and was Issue 138 resolution sufficient?)
- Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid (and was Issue 138 resolution sufficient?)
- [RC4] Release Notes
- Re: first-letter-punct-before-* tests unnecessarily hard to use
- first-letter-punct-before-* tests unnecessarily hard to use
- Re: RC4 build published
Wednesday, 22 December 2010
- Re: RC4 Invalid tests
- Re: block-in-inline-relpos-002 invalid (and was Issue 138 resolution sufficient?)
- Re: RC4 build published
Tuesday, 21 December 2010
- Re: RC4 build published
- Re: RC4 build published
- Re: RC4 build published
- Re: Tests and http
- Re: [RC4] bidi-alt-001 Re: RC4 Invalid tests
- Re: Tests and http
- Re: [RC4] bidi-alt-001 Re: RC4 Invalid tests
- Re: Tests and http
Sunday, 19 December 2010
Saturday, 18 December 2010
- [RC4] bidi-alt-001 Re: RC4 Invalid tests
- 1st CFP: IJCAI-11 Workshop on Discovering Meaning On the Go in Large & Heterogeneous Data (LHD-11)
Friday, 17 December 2010
Tuesday, 14 December 2010
Monday, 13 December 2010
- Re: RC4 Invalid tests
- Re: RC4 Invalid tests
- RC4 Invalid tests
- [RC4] absolute-non-replaced-width-013 assert text inaccurate
- Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002
- [RC4] absolute-non-replaced-width-004 and absolute-non-replaced-width-005 proposed assert text
- CSS2.1 RC4 online in the harness
- Re: Connexions to testsuite harness and other related csswg.org webpages
- Connexions to testsuite harness and other related csswg.org webpages
- [RC4] active-selector-002
Saturday, 11 December 2010
- [RC4] absolute-non-replaced-width-008 and absolute-non-replaced-width-009 : corrections to do in /* comments */
- Re: [RC4] c525-font-wt-000.xht
- [RC4] c525-font-wt-000.xht
- [RC4] Update: Test files not placed in any Chapter-*.xht
- [RC4] text-indent-113 reference
- Re: RC4 build published
Friday, 10 December 2010
- Re: RC4 build published
- Re: RC4 build published
- Re: RC4 build published
- RE: RC4 build published
- RC4 build published
Thursday, 9 December 2010
- RE: [RC3] Test files not placed in any Chapter-*.xht
- Re: [RC3] Test files not placed in any Chapter-*.xht
- Re: bidi-alt-001 probably invalid
- Re: [RC2] 13 Testcases with a missing (9 ahem, 4 dom) flag
- Re: [RC3] 6 matches, not 5 in c5505-mrgn-000 testcase
- Re: Reftest support landed in the harness
- Re: Reftest support landed in the harness
- Re: [CSS 2.1] WD 07 Dec. 2010: section 15.3 on unquoted font family names with sequences of white spaces
- [RC3] 6 matches, not 5 in c5505-mrgn-000 testcase
- Reftest support landed in the harness
- Re: [CSS 2.1] WD 07 Dec. 2010: section 15.3 on unquoted font family names with sequences of white spaces
Wednesday, 8 December 2010
- [CSS 2.1] WD 07 Dec. 2010: section 15.3 on unquoted font family names with sequences of white spaces
- [RC3] font-family-rule-017 (was RE: review of Microsoft CSS 2.1 font tests)
- Re: PrinceXML 7.1 partial implementation report
- RE: review of Microsoft CSS 2.1 font tests
- RE: [RC3] absolute-non-replaced-height-003 and absolute-non-replaced-max-height-003 : vertical centering
- Re: PrinceXML 7.1 partial implementation report
- RE: [RC2] absolute-non-replaced-height-001 and Safari IR
- RE: height-applies-to-00[123]
- A few notes from testing PrinceXML
- PrinceXML 7.1 partial implementation report
- Re: text-transform-bicameral-004 probably invalid
- Re: text-transform-bicameral-004 probably invalid
Tuesday, 7 December 2010
- Re: text-transform-bicameral-004 probably invalid
- Re: inlines-003
- Re: page-breaks-101 probably invalid
- Re: review of Microsoft CSS 2.1 font tests
- Re: HTML tests? (html-attribute-*/html-precedence-*)
- Re: background-position-201 and its outer circle
- Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002
- Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002
- Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002
Monday, 6 December 2010
- Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002
- Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002
- Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002
- Re: height-applies-to-00[123]
- Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002
Sunday, 5 December 2010
- Re: background-root-004/005/006/007/008/009/010/013 have incorrect pass conditions
- Re: Bidi tests
- Re: support/ref-green-box-100x100.htm incorrect
- Re: bidi tests assume undefined letter-spacing behavior
- Re: bidi-004 probably invalid
- Re: bidi-009 invalid
Saturday, 4 December 2010
- Re: background-root-004/005/006/007/008/009/010/013 have incorrect pass conditions
- Re: background-root-004/005/006/007/008/009/010/013 have incorrect pass conditions
- RE: RC3 table-height-algorithm-027
- RE: RC3 table-height-algorithm-027
- RE: [RC3] absolute-non-replaced-height-003 and absolute-non-replaced-max-height-003 : vertical centering
- RE: [RC2] absolute-non-replaced-height-001 and Safari IR
- RE: [RC3] containing-block-017 and containing-block-003 not testing what they are supposed to test
- RE: height-applies-to-00[123]
- Re: bidi-breaking-002 probably invalid (items 3 and 4)
Friday, 3 December 2010
- Re: c43-center-000 assumes line-height 'normal' == '1'
- Re: incorrect pass conditions in c525-font-wt-000 (font-weight)
- Re: incorrect pass condition in c43-rpl-bbx-000/001
- Re: confusing pass conditions in c543-txt-decor-000
- Re: table-height-algorithm-026 invalid
- RE: table-height-algorithm-026 invalid
- Re: table-height-algorithm-026 invalid
- RE: border-collapse-inherited-001 makes invalid assumptions about UA style sheet
- RE: [RC3] absolute-non-replaced-height-003 and absolute-non-replaced-max-height-003 : vertical centering
- RE: RC3 table-height-algorithm-027
- RE: table-height-algorithm-027
- RE: content-140 pass condition is incorrect
- RE: empty-cells-applies-to-001 isn't quite a box
- RE: table-height-algorithm-026 invalid
- RE: Microsoft's numbers-units-014 and table-height-algorithm-026
- RE: [RC3] table-height-algorithm-005 is invalid
- RE: [RC2] absolute-non-replaced-height-001 and Safari IR
- RE: floats-031 invalid
- RE: height-applies-to-00[123]
- page-breaks-101 probably invalid
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-12-01
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-12-01
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-12-01
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-12-01
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-12-01
Thursday, 2 December 2010
- Re: Prince partial implementation report
- Re: Prince partial implementation report
- Re: line-height-014 is invalid
- Re: height-applies-to-00[123]
- RE: line-height-014 is invalid
- RE: height-applies-to-00[123]
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-12-01
- Re: background-intrinsic-004
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-12-01
- Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2010-12-01
- Reftests info in metadata
- Re: height-applies-to-00[123]
- Re: background-intrinsic-004
- Re: Implementation report for RC3 on IE9 Platform preview 7
- Re: line-height-014 is invalid
- Re: line-height-014 is invalid
- RE: line-height-014 is invalid
- RE: [RC3] containing-block-017 and containing-block-003 not testing what they are supposed to test
- RE: height-applies-to-00[123]
- RE: [RC3] content-attr-case-002
- RE: lang-selector-006
- RE: [RC3] content-160
- RE: Proposed adjustment for first 26 at-charset testcases (was Re: at-charset-013)
- RE: [RC3] Test files not placed in any Chapter-*.xht
- RE: [RC3] numbers-units-014 again
- RE: [RC3] top-offset-002 assert text
- RE: at-charset-013
- RE: user-stylesheet-015 invalid because it assumes other rules not present at user level
- RE: [RC3] assert of absolute-non-replaced-height-004 ; numbers-units-008 rejectable
- RE: [RC3] table-layout-003 is not testing what it was supposed to be testing
- RE: [RC3] Problems with absolute-non-replaced-max-height-002
- Re: inlines-003
- Re: c5504-mrgn-l-002 is invalid
- Re: c5504-mrgn-l-002 is invalid
Wednesday, 1 December 2010
- Re: inlines-003
- Re: contradictions between clearance tests
- Re: background-intrinsic-004
- Re: contradictions between clearance tests
- Re: inlines-003
- Re: inlines-003
- Prince partial implementation report
- Re: inlines-003
- Re: pass condition incorrect for c5525-fltwidth-002
- Re: Implementation report for RC3 on IE9 Platform preview 7
- Re: c5504-mrgn-l-002 is invalid
- Re: c5504-mrgn-l-002 is invalid
- Re: Implementation Report Template for CSS2.1 Test Suite
- Re: c5504-mrgn-l-002 is invalid
- Re: pass condition incorrect for c5525-fltwidth-002
- Re: c566-list-stl-000 is invalid
- Re: incorrect pass conditions for c534-bgreps-000/001/002/003/004/005
- Re: incorrect pass conditions for content-white-space-003/004
- Re: first-letter-punct-before-001 invalid
- Re: Incorrect @charset tests
- Re: floats-117/120/122 invalid because they assume line-height 'normal' == '1'
- Re: inlines-003
- Re: background-intrinsic-005
- Re: background-intrinsic-004
- Re: bad pass conditions in margin-collapse-123/125
- Re: contradictions between clearance tests
- Re: margin-collapse-157 probably invalid