W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-commits@w3.org > January 2012

csswg/css3-flexbox Overview.html,1.141,1.142 Overview.src.html,1.139,1.140

From: Tab Atkins Jr.. via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:53:43 +0000
To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Rs2ul-0001CJ-Lr@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-flexbox
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv4589

Modified Files:
	Overview.html Overview.src.html 
Log Message:
Add issue containing Alex's suggestion for simpler free-space-distribution step.

Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-flexbox/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.141
retrieving revision 1.142
diff -u -d -r1.141 -r1.142
--- Overview.html	31 Jan 2012 01:22:27 -0000	1.141
+++ Overview.html	31 Jan 2012 01:53:41 -0000	1.142
@@ -1949,6 +1949,25 @@
   <p>To <dfn id=resolve-the-flexible-lengths>resolve the flexible
    lengths</dfn> of the items within a flexbox line:
 
+  <div class=issue>
+   <p>Alex suggests that the following should work more simply:</p>
+
+   <ol>
+    <li>distribute space
+
+    <li>fix max violations
+
+    <li>distribute space
+
+    <li>fix min violations. items with violation lose flexibility.
+
+    <li>repeat until there are no more violations
+   </ol>
+
+   <p>I need to think on this and ensure it won't give suboptimal results in
+    some cases.</p>
+  </div>
+
   <ol>
    <li>If this is the first time this step is reached in the current
     invocation of this algorithm, <a

Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-flexbox/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.139
retrieving revision 1.140
diff -u -d -r1.139 -r1.140
--- Overview.src.html	31 Jan 2012 01:22:27 -0000	1.139
+++ Overview.src.html	31 Jan 2012 01:53:41 -0000	1.140
@@ -954,6 +954,18 @@
 
 	<p>To <dfn>resolve the flexible lengths</dfn> of the items within a flexbox line:</p>
 
+	<div class='issue'>
+		<p>Alex suggests that the following should work more simply:</p>
+		<ol>
+			<li>distribute space
+			<li>fix max violations
+			<li>distribute space
+			<li>fix min violations. items with violation lose flexibility.
+			<li>repeat until there are no more violations
+		</ol>
+		<p>I need to think on this and ensure it won't give suboptimal results in some cases.</p>
+	</div>
+
 	<ol>
 		<li>If this is the first time this step is reached in the current invocation of this algorithm, <i>distribute the free space</i> in the flexbox line, then <i>fix max size violations</i>, then <i>fix min size violations</i>.</li>
 
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 01:53:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:09 UTC